Skip to main content

A Trap for Iran? Tel Aviv Wants to Drag Tehran Into the Lebanon War, Former Ambassador Warns



As Israel intensifies its strikes on southern Lebanon, a senior Iranian diplomat is warning that the escalation is no accident — it may be a calculated attempt to lure Iran back into open war.


In an interview with Iran's Khabar Online news agency, Mohammad Irani, Iran's former ambassador to Lebanon and Kuwait and a former director-general of the Middle East desk at the Foreign Ministry, argued that "Tel Aviv is seeking to drag Iran into the Lebanon war," adding that Netanyahu "needs to focus a major part of his efforts on drawing Iran into the conflict and is, in fact, waiting for Iran's reaction."

The Netanyahu Factor

Irani told Khabar Online that the timing of the escalation is closely tied to Israel's domestic politics ahead of elections. "Netanyahu's situation is not favorable politically," he said, arguing that a wartime atmosphere benefits the Israeli premier. "The war atmosphere on the eve of the elections will ultimately work in Netanyahu's favor," Irani noted, adding that Israel's political space currently favors hardline, extremist currents, leaving little room for moderates.

Much of the interview focused on Israel's claim to have seized the Ali al-Taher heights, a strategically vital position overlooking the city of Nabatieh and the Litani River. Irani stressed that "Ali al-Taher is not an ordinary point" — it has long served as a resistance stronghold with surveillance facilities and tunnels since Israel's 2000 withdrawal, and its capture would be a significant strategic gain.

However, he expressed skepticism: "The claim of capturing Ali al-Taher may be exaggerated." He suggested the announcement may be partly electioneering, noting that some observers and local sources believe the claim is largely propaganda. Still, he cautioned that if true, the military and political implications should not be dismissed, as the heights allow monitoring of movement across the Litani corridor.

The Deadlock: Disarmament vs. Withdrawal

On prospects for an Israeli pullout, Irani was pessimistic. Israel, he explained, has conditioned any withdrawal on the disarmament of Hezbollah and the extension of Lebanese state sovereignty to the south — terms anchored in the June 26 framework agreement between Lebanon, the United States, and Israel. But Hezbollah, Irani emphasized, "was not a party to this agreement and does not consider itself bound by it," and rejects the equation of "disarmament in exchange for withdrawal."

"It is unlikely that anyone should expect an Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon anytime soon," Irani concluded — especially, he warned, while Israel watches and waits for Tehran's response.


*Source: Khabar Online, "A New Trap for Iran?" — interview with Mohammad Irani, September 9, 2026 (18 Shahrivar 1405).*

More News

Iran’s Leaderless War Machine: The IRGC’s Autonomous Cells and the Escalation Nobody Controls

In the fog of a war that has already claimed Iran’s supreme leader and its top military brass, a new and perhaps more dangerous threat is emerging from the rubble of Tehran’s shattered command structure: a Revolutionary Guard Corps that, by design, no longer needs orders from above. Sources with direct knowledge of the situation confirm that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) continues to prosecute strikes across the region not under the direction of the new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, but according to pre-programmed autonomous protocols embedded deep within its decentralized “mosaic defense” architecture. The result is a war machine that has become, in the most literal sense, self-propelling — and increasingly difficult for anyone to stop. A New Supreme Leader With Limited Command Mojtaba Khamenei was formally elected Supreme Leader on 8 March 2026, succeeding his father Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in the opening wave of the US-Israeli “Operation Epic Fury...

2026 US/Israel–Iran War Risk: Why the Chance of Escalation Is Meaningfully Elevated

As 2025 closes, the US/Israel–Iran confrontation is no longer a low-grade shadow struggle managed mainly through diplomacy and proxy conflicts ; it is an openly articulated deterrence contest in which leaders have publicly tied credibility to “red lines” and rapid retaliation. President Trump has stated that if Iran rebuilds its nuclear capabilities or continues rebuilding missile capacity , the response could be immediate and more severe—language that reduces room for quiet de-escalation once a new incident occurs.  At the same time, Iran has replied with warnings of harsh consequences for any renewed attacks, reinforcing a mutual-threat environment where misperception and political signaling can substitute for verifiable facts.  Against that backdrop, the key analytical point for 2026 is not whether a “full war” is the default outcome; it is that the probability that a limited clash escalates into a broader, sustained conflict is meaningfully elevated because the stabili...

Iran's Headscarf Rules Quietly Loosen — But No Law Has Changed

Bareheaded women appear openly in Tehran cafés and streets, yet activists warn the shift is fragile and the law remains on the books. Images have been circulating on social media of something that would have been almost unimaginable in Iran just a few years ago: women sipping coffee in Tehran cafés, strolling busy city streets, and sitting in restaurants — all without a headscarf. The scenes have ignited global attention and renewed debate over whether the Islamic Republic is quietly retreating from one of its most defining ideological pillars. For decades, wearing the hijab in public has been mandatory for all women in Iran — a rule enshrined in the Islamic Penal Code since 1983 and treated as a cornerstone of the clerical state established after the 1979 revolution. Violations could result in fines, arrest, or worse. Yet in recent weeks and months, enforcement appears to have noticeably slackened, at least in major urban centres. A Visible Shift on the Streets Reporters and residents...