As U.S. and Israeli strikes enter their second week, a leading defense scholar argues the Trump administration is prosecuting a war without a coherent political strategy — and that history warns of the consequences. Since U.S. and Israeli forces launched joint strikes on Iran on February 28, the military campaign has been sweeping in its reach. According to Trump, speaking to Republican lawmakers, the operation has targeted over 5,000 locations, neutralized much of Iran's missile arsenal, and eliminated drone production sites. Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei was killed in the opening salvo, with Iran subsequently naming his hardline son, Mojtaba Khamenei, as his successor. Yet for all the tactical momentum, a fundamental question hangs unanswered: what does Washington actually want from this war? Writing in Foreign Affairs on March 10, Colin H. Kahl — Director of the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies at Stanford University and former U.S. Undersecretary of Defense for ...
In a significant escalation of the Middle East conflict, Saudi Arabia has formally invoked its Strategic Mutual Defence Agreement (SMDA) with Pakistan following a series of Iranian missile and drone attacks on Saudi territory. The pact, signed in September 2025, commits both nations to treat any aggression against one as an attack on both, mirroring NATO’s Article 5. The invocation came after Iran targeted key Saudi infrastructure, including the Ras Tanura oil refinery and Prince Sultan Air Base, which hosts thousands of U.S. troops. Saudi Defense Minister Prince Khalid bin Salman confirmed the move during a high-level meeting with Pakistan’s Army Chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, on March 7. “We discussed Iranian attacks on the Kingdom and the measures needed to halt them within the framework of our Joint Strategic Defense Agreement,” Prince Khalid stated on social media. The meeting marked the first operational test of the pact, which includes joint deterrence, intell...