In the crowded field of wartime hyperbole, Turkish columnist İbrahim Karagül has never been content with mere exaggeration. His latest offering, published Friday in the conservative daily Yeni Åžafak, reads less like political analysis and more like the fever dream of a medieval sultan who has just discovered Twitter. It is, by any sober measure, a remarkable document — and not in a good way. Karagül opens with a triumphalist assessment of the US-Israeli military campaign against Iran that will strike most observers as detached from available evidence. In his telling, America and Israel have achieved nothing except bombing girls' schools and civilian infrastructure — while Iran, far from being weakened, has blinded Israeli radar systems, set American bases ablaze, driven a US aircraft carrier out of the region, and is now preparing "the largest oil shock in history" and targeting American banks across the Middle East. HSBC and Citigroup, he reports, have already begun wit...
The US-Israeli war against Iran has done more than redraw military balances in the Middle East — it has forced a reckoning with the very conceptual frameworks through which the region is understood. So argues Turkish political commentator Yasin Aktay in a wide-ranging piece published Saturday, which draws on recent academic literature to make the case that Iran's strategic behavior cannot be reduced to ideology, and that Turkey stands at a pivotal crossroads as a result. Iran Is a State, Not Just a Revolution The central intellectual move in Aktay's analysis is a turn away from purely ideological readings of Iranian foreign policy. He highlights a recent article by political scientist M. Hakan Yavuz, published on atlasthink.org under the title "Iran's Strategic Logic: Fuller, Nasr, and the Consequences of the 2026 War," which synthesizes the work of scholars Graham Fuller and Vali Nasr to argue that Iran behaves above all as a geopolitically constrained state rath...