By Dr. Nikolaos Stelgias In a remarkable display of diplomatic achievement, the United States, Israel, and Iran announced a ceasefire on Tuesday night that has already proven itself entirely indistinguishable from the conflict it was meant to end — at least if you happen to live in Lebanon. The good news arrived swiftly: US President Donald Trump announced the historic pause in hostilities, and the guns fell silent. Or rather, some of them did. In some places. Sort of. By Wednesday morning, the IDF had struck over 100 Hezbollah command centers and military sites across Beirut and southern Lebanon in what it proudly described as its "largest coordinated wave of strikes" since the launch of Operation Roaring Lion. One can only imagine how the smaller waves must have felt. The strikes targeted Hezbollah headquarters, intelligence facilities, missile infrastructure, naval units, and the elite Radwan force — a comprehensive to-do list that, by any reasonable measure, suggests t...
While US and Israeli strikes continue to degrade Iran's military infrastructure, Tehran is quietly winning the battle that matters most — the psychological and civil arena — according to a sharp analytical piece published in the Israeli daily Maariv by reserve Lieutenant Colonel Amit Yagur. Yagur argues that the fundamental flaw in the Western approach to the conflict lies in its almost exclusive focus on the military domain. Washington, he writes, operates under the assumption that stripping Iran of its military capabilities will force the regime into submission. Israel, until recently, held a similar logic in Gaza and Lebanon, measuring success through strikes on senior figures and weapons depots. Iran, by contrast, has abandoned any pretense of military parity from the outset. The regime, Yagur contends, has accepted its military inferiority and is willing to absorb military losses in exchange for dominance in the arena where it has chosen to compete: the battle for perception a...