Skip to main content

The European Void in the Balkans and Turkey*



The void felt by the European Union in the Balkans is opening up space for Russia and China through Serbian leader Aleksandar Vučić. Turkey is active on the ground, but its influence has limits.

by Ahmet Erdi Öztürk


Truck drivers in the Western Balkans are preparing for renewed blockades at the European Union borders on September 14. At first glance, the issue appears technical. The Schengen rule allowing only a 90-day stay within a 180-day period is increasingly complicating international transport in the region. Drivers are transporting Europe's goods and working for the European market, yet they are still treated under tourist status. It is reported that around 5,000 drivers are affected by this situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina alone. Similar complaints exist in Serbia, Montenegro, and North Macedonia. If a solution is not found, new border blockades may be on the agenda.

This is actually a small example of a much larger problem between the Balkans and Europe. The region is economically tied to Europe and is a part of Europe in terms of security, but politically, it remains outside the door. For years, the EU has been offering a membership perspective to the Western Balkans. Summits are held, reform packages are announced, and support programs worth billions of euros are prepared. However, the underlying sentiment in the region remains unchanged: they are heading toward Europe, but they just can't seem to arrive. This also concerns Turkey, situated on the other side of the map, representing both an opportunity and a risk. And this is our main issue as well.

Europe's Endless Waiting Room

At the EU-Western Balkans Summit held in Tivat, Montenegro, in June, the same message was conveyed again. The region's future appears tied to the EU. Brussels views enlargement as crucial for Europe's security and stability. Furthermore, in the face of the growing Russian threat, Europe also needs the Balkan buffer. In this context, the 6 billion euro growth and reform program for the Western Balkans is ongoing. However, the problem is no longer about the promises made, but rather when these promises will be realized.

The political landscape in the region is also not calm in itself. Protests against Aleksandar Vučić's administration in Serbia have been ongoing for a long time. The future of the central state and ethnic balances are once again being debated in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The Kosovo-Serbia line remains fragile. The European Union continues to be the largest economic partner for these countries, but its political influence does not always seem to match its economic might.

Following the cancellation of EU Enlargement Commissioner Marta Kos's visit due to the organization of a state funeral in Belgrade for Ratko Mladić—known as the "Butcher of Bosnia," who died in prison as a convicted perpetrator of genocide and war crimes—Vučić abandoned his plans to attend the funeral.

Turkey is Already in the Region

The void created by Europe naturally opens up space for other actors. Russia is trying to maintain its influence, particularly through Serbia. China is expanding in the region through infrastructure and financing. Investments from Gulf countries are drawing attention. Turkey, on the other hand, is following a different path. Ankara is no longer acting in the Balkans solely on the basis of history, culture, or identity; it also has other concerns here, primarily its own economic challenges.

Turkey's current Balkan policy rests on a much broader foundation. Trade, the defense industry, energy, transportation, infrastructure, military presence, and diplomatic contacts have become the main pillars of this relationship. Ankara's greatest advantage is not merely its closeness with a few countries. It can simultaneously communicate with almost all the actors who are at odds with one another. Serbia is one of the most striking examples of this. During the meeting between President Erdoğan and Aleksandar Vučić in Ankara in February 2026, it was decided to expand cooperation in the fields of the defense industry, energy, transportation, and technology. The Turkey-Serbia trade volume reached approximately 3.5 billion dollars in 2025. The current target is 5 billion dollars.

Turkey, the Balkans, and NATO

At the same time, Turkey explicitly supports the territorial integrity of Bosnia and Herzegovina. It plays a significant military role in the NATO force KFOR in Kosovo. It is also one of the largest non-EU contributors of personnel to the EUFOR operation in Bosnia. This landscape enables Ankara to establish contact with Belgrade, Sarajevo, and Pristina simultaneously.

The Balkan Peace Platform, which convened for the second time in Istanbul in January, served as an excellent example of this approach. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Kosovo, Albania, Montenegro, and North Macedonia gathered around the same table. Turkey's increasingly visible role in the region emerges precisely here. Ankara is not only developing its own bilateral relations but is also striving to open channels of communication between countries that have difficulty speaking to one another.

As Much Risk as Opportunity

However, this picture does not solely represent an opportunity for Turkey. Being able to talk to everyone is a significant advantage, but when a serious crisis erupts, remaining equally close to everyone is much more difficult. If a new political crisis breaks out in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Ankara's balancing act between Sarajevo and Belgrade will be tested. If Kosovo-Serbia tensions escalate again, Turkey's military role within NATO and the close relationship it has fostered with Serbia could simultaneously come under pressure.

Turkey is no longer a country with only historical ties in the Balkans. It is an actor with economic investments, a military presence, defense relations, and political weight. And this brings responsibility. Europe's indecision may grant Turkey more room to maneuver in the short term. However, if the region becomes severely polarized once again, that same space could turn into a serious burden for Ankara.

The Real Issue is Managing the Void

Turkey cannot take the EU's place in the Balkans. That is not the point anyway. Europe is still by far the largest economic and institutional power in the region. However, the longer the Balkan countries wait at Europe's door, the larger the resulting political void grows.

The visa issue for drivers actually illustrates exactly this; seemingly small practical conveniences can open up space for Ankara, but Turkey must not exaggerate this space and get carried away by a sense of strategic superiority. For Turkey, the real issue is not filling this void. It is managing it correctly.

Because it is easy to establish relationships in the Balkans. It is much more difficult to preserve all of those relationships simultaneously when a crisis breaks out.

*This article was originally published in the Yetkin Report on September 6, 2026. The opinions expressed within do not necessarily reflect the editorial stance of The Levant Files.

** The graphic was created with the help of AI technology. 

More News

Iran’s Leaderless War Machine: The IRGC’s Autonomous Cells and the Escalation Nobody Controls

In the fog of a war that has already claimed Iran’s supreme leader and its top military brass, a new and perhaps more dangerous threat is emerging from the rubble of Tehran’s shattered command structure: a Revolutionary Guard Corps that, by design, no longer needs orders from above. Sources with direct knowledge of the situation confirm that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) continues to prosecute strikes across the region not under the direction of the new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, but according to pre-programmed autonomous protocols embedded deep within its decentralized “mosaic defense” architecture. The result is a war machine that has become, in the most literal sense, self-propelling — and increasingly difficult for anyone to stop. A New Supreme Leader With Limited Command Mojtaba Khamenei was formally elected Supreme Leader on 8 March 2026, succeeding his father Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in the opening wave of the US-Israeli “Operation Epic Fury...

2026 US/Israel–Iran War Risk: Why the Chance of Escalation Is Meaningfully Elevated

As 2025 closes, the US/Israel–Iran confrontation is no longer a low-grade shadow struggle managed mainly through diplomacy and proxy conflicts ; it is an openly articulated deterrence contest in which leaders have publicly tied credibility to “red lines” and rapid retaliation. President Trump has stated that if Iran rebuilds its nuclear capabilities or continues rebuilding missile capacity , the response could be immediate and more severe—language that reduces room for quiet de-escalation once a new incident occurs.  At the same time, Iran has replied with warnings of harsh consequences for any renewed attacks, reinforcing a mutual-threat environment where misperception and political signaling can substitute for verifiable facts.  Against that backdrop, the key analytical point for 2026 is not whether a “full war” is the default outcome; it is that the probability that a limited clash escalates into a broader, sustained conflict is meaningfully elevated because the stabili...

Iran's Headscarf Rules Quietly Loosen — But No Law Has Changed

Bareheaded women appear openly in Tehran cafés and streets, yet activists warn the shift is fragile and the law remains on the books. Images have been circulating on social media of something that would have been almost unimaginable in Iran just a few years ago: women sipping coffee in Tehran cafés, strolling busy city streets, and sitting in restaurants — all without a headscarf. The scenes have ignited global attention and renewed debate over whether the Islamic Republic is quietly retreating from one of its most defining ideological pillars. For decades, wearing the hijab in public has been mandatory for all women in Iran — a rule enshrined in the Islamic Penal Code since 1983 and treated as a cornerstone of the clerical state established after the 1979 revolution. Violations could result in fines, arrest, or worse. Yet in recent weeks and months, enforcement appears to have noticeably slackened, at least in major urban centres. A Visible Shift on the Streets Reporters and residents...