A new regulation allowing headscarves in Turkish Cypriot middle schools has ignited heated debate across the internationally unrecgonized Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC), with officials, political parties, and civil society organizations expressing divergent views on the policy shift.
New Regulation Implemented
Last week, the TRNC Ministry of Education amended its dress code regulation following an incident at İrsen Küçük Middle School, where a student was denied entry for wearing a headscarf. The new rules permit students to wear headscarves for religious beliefs, specifically allowing a cap with a bandana on top. The regulation stipulates that these items must be plain, single-colored, and free of any designs, patterns, writing, symbols, or markings.
Education Minister Nazım Çavuşoğlu noted that while headscarves had already been permitted in high schools and universities, this amendment removes the prohibition at the middle school level as well.
"The regulation change was implemented quickly across all middle schools in the TRNC," said Minister Çavuşoğlu, according to TGRT Haber.
Criticism from Multiple Directions
The new regulation has drawn criticism from various political factions and civic groups. Turkey's Renewed Welfare Party (Yeniden Refah Partisi) condemned the restrictions on headscarf specifications, arguing they constitute interference with religious freedom. Party representatives emphasized that "the state cannot dictate the shape of the headscarf," according to Kıbrıs Gerçek.
Former Turkish Cypriot leader Mustafa Akıncı weighed in on the debate, emphasizing that education should focus on students' intellectual development rather than their appearance. "In education, what matters is nurturing children's minds; ensuring they grow up as reading, thinking, questioning free individuals," Akıncı stated in a social media post, as reported by Bugün Kıbrıs.
Kudret Özersay, leader of the People's Party (HP), expressed concerns about potential damage to secular education. "Secular education is both a constitutional obligation and a responsibility to society," he said, questioning the government's intentions behind the regulation change. "What is the Ministry of Education trying to accomplish with this amendment?" he asked, according to Özgür Gazete Kıbrıs.
The Independence Road Party (Bağımsızlık Yolu) argued that the regulation allows for religious propaganda in schools. Münür Rahvancıoğlu, the party's Financial Secretary, contended that schools should be centers of knowledge and research, not forums for religious instruction, as noted by Bağımsızlık Yolu's website and social media channels.
Union Response
The Turkish Cypriot Secondary Education Teachers' Union (KTOEÖS) has mounted protests against the regulation, including placing black wreaths at the Turkish Embassy and Parliament. Union President Selma Eylem declared, "We will not bow to those who want to drag our children, our education, and our society into darkness. We will continue our struggle," according to Bugün Kıbrıs.
Teachers have increasingly voiced concerns about restrictions limiting freedoms, emphasizing the importance of teaching young people to both claim their own freedoms while respecting others'.
Echoes of "February 28" Tensions
The controversy has evoked memories of Turkey's "February 28" period, when similar headscarf restrictions sparked national debate. The student and her family's refusal to either remove the headscarf or change schools prompted the Education Ministry's intervention in amending the dress code.
The headscarf regulation amendment has brought education policies and religious freedom to the forefront of public discourse in Northern Cyprus. While some view the lifting of the middle school headscarf ban as a positive step, others criticize the specific restrictions and regulations imposed.
The controversy reflects broader tensions in Turkish Cypriot society regarding secularism, religious expression, and educational values, with various stakeholders advocating for an education system guided by secular and liberal principles.
Cultural Divide: Turkish Cypriots and Mainland People
The headscarf controversy in Northern Cyprus's schools highlights a deeper sociopolitical tension that has been simmering for decades between native Turkish Cypriots and people (called settlers in the southern part of the island) from mainland Turkey (Anatolia). This division transcends mere geography, encompassing profound differences in class structure, social values, political orientation, and cultural identity.
Turkish Cypriots, with their deep historical roots on the island, largely embrace ultra-secular values that emerged from their unique historical context, including British colonial influence and decades of coexistence with Greek Cypriots. Their identity is distinctly Mediterranean and island-based, with many identifying as "Cypriots" first and foremost. This community generally advocates for progressive politics, secular governance, and maintains cultural practices that differ significantly from mainland Turkish traditions.
In contrast, citizens from mainland Turkey, with a very different class and socioeconomic background, who began arriving after the 1974 war and continue to immigrate today, often bring more conservative social and religious values aligned with those promoted by Turkey's government. Many maintain stronger ties to Turkish nationalism and religious conservatism, viewing issues like the headscarf through a different cultural lens than native Turkish Cypriots.
This tension has been exacerbated by demographic changes, as mainland settlers and their descendants now constitute a significant portion of the Turkish Cypriot population. The resulting power dynamics affect everything from electoral politics to educational policies, with Turkish Cypriot secularists increasingly concerned about what they perceive as the "Anatolianization" or "Turkification" of their distinct culture and institutions.
The current headscarf debate thus represents not merely a disagreement over school dress codes, but rather a flashpoint in an ongoing struggle over the fundamental identity and future direction of Northern Cyprus society—whether it will continue to reflect the distinctive secular Turkish Cypriot character or increasingly align with the more conservative religious and cultural norms prevalent in contemporary Turkey.
The February 28 Process: Turkey's "Postmodern Coup" and Its Legacy
The current headscarf controversy in Northern Cyprus evokes memories of one of Turkey's most tumultuous political periods, known as the "February 28 Process" or "Postmodern Coup" of 1997. On February 28, 1997, Turkey's National Security Council, dominated by military leaders, issued a memorandum to Prime Minister Necmettin Erbakan of the Islamist Welfare Party (Refah Partisi), demanding measures to curb what they perceived as rising religious fundamentalism that threatened Turkey's secular constitution.
Unlike previous military interventions in Turkey, this "coup" involved no tanks in the streets or direct seizure of power. Instead, through intense pressure from the secular establishment, media campaigns, and threat of military action, Erbakan was forced to resign in June 1997. Subsequently, his party was banned by Turkey's Constitutional Court, and a secularist government was installed.
One of the most contentious aspects of this period was the strict enforcement of headscarf bans in universities and public institutions. Thousands of female students were denied education for wearing headscarves, creating deep societal wounds. Civil servants suspected of Islamic leanings were purged from government positions in what critics called a "witch hunt."
The February 28 Process had profound and lasting effects on Turkish politics and society. Rather than diminishing political Islam, the military intervention eventually strengthened it. The movement reorganized under Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's leadership with the Justice and Development Party (AKP), which came to power in 2002 with promises of democratic reform and greater religious freedom.
When the AKP consolidated power, it gradually reversed many February 28-era policies, including lifting headscarf bans in universities (2010) and public institutions (2013). This reversal was portrayed as the triumph of democracy over military tutelage and religious freedom over forced secularism.
Today, the legacy of February 28 remains controversial in Turkey, with competing narratives. Secular Kemalists view it as a necessary intervention to protect Turkey's constitutional order, while religious conservatives see it as an unjust persecution that violated basic freedoms. The contemporary Turkish government under Erdoğan has prosecuted many military officers involved in the 1997 intervention.
The echoes of this conflict now resonate in Northern Cyprus, where similar tensions between secularism and religious expression have emerged around the headscarf issue in schools, reflecting how Turkey's internal political struggles continue to influence Turkish Cypriot society despite the distinct cultural and historical differences between the two communities.
(NS)
Photo: Rowaq Arabi (https://cihrs-rowaq.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/طالبة-محجبة-في-مدرسة-أوروبية.-آي-ستوك..jpg)