In a statement, the SDC criticized the formation, which it had hoped would represent a step towards broader participation and an end to Syrians' suffering. The Council argued that the new government fails to reflect Syria's diverse political and social components, instead being dominated by unilateral, ideological leanings despite the inclusion of some technocratic figures.
The SDC specifically highlighted the significant lack of genuine representation for women, who constitute a substantial segment of Syrian society and have endured immense hardship, displacement, violence, and political marginalization throughout the conflict years.
The Council asserted that forming a government dominated by a single entity cannot be considered progress towards a solution. It dismissed "sweet words and superficial slogans," emphasizing that any legitimate government must be founded on genuine national partnership and incorporate all effective forces on the ground to meet the aspirations of the Syrian people.
The SDC views the appointment method as evidence of the Damascus authority's continued disregard for fundamental principles of participation and diversity, suggesting a lack of commitment to a genuine transitional phase that could rebuild the Syrian state on sound political foundations.
Calling on all Syrian national forces to collaborate, the SDC urged pursuing a new political path based on genuine democratic principles, respecting the rights of all communities, and avoiding failed exclusionary policies. The statement concluded by stressing the need for new solutions rooted in dialogue and consensus rather than repeating approaches that have exacerbated the crisis and prolonged the suffering of the Syrian people.