Skip to main content

Pope Francis Accused of Fueling Antisemitism in Posthumous Critique

 

Following the death of Pope Francis at age 88, a controversial critique has emerged, accusing the late pontiff of degrading the Church and bearing significant responsibility for the recent rise in global antisemitism. In an opinion piece published in Israel Hayom, Dror Eydar argues vehemently that Israel should refrain from sending high-level representation to the Pope's funeral, citing Francis's actions and statements since the October 7 Hamas attack on Israel.

Eydar's central argument contends that Pope Francis failed the Jewish people in a time of crisis. The piece highlights the Pope's sermon in St. Peter's Square the day after the massacre, criticizing his failure to mention "even once, the atrocities committed by barbarians against the people of God." This silence, Eydar argues, set a precedent for the Pope's stance throughout the subsequent conflict, where he is accused of consistently criticizing Israel with "venomous language" and even questioning whether Israel was committing "genocide" in Gaza. The critique asserts Francis disproportionately emphasized the suffering of children in Gaza while neglecting Israeli children victimized by the attacks.

Furthermore, Eydar draws a stark historical parallel, claiming Francis's alleged antisemitism "rivals only that of Pope Pius XII," who faced criticism for his public silence during the Holocaust. Eydar posits a crucial difference: where Pius XII remained silent, Francis allegedly spoke out against the victims, effectively blaming Israel for the violence inflicted upon its citizens. "We have national dignity," Eydar writes, "especially for our martyrs—the victims of October 7—whom the pope did not mourn but rather blamed their people for their deaths."

The critique extends beyond the immediate conflict, portraying Pope Francis not primarily as a spiritual leader but as a "politician and social activist with socialist, even Marxist, leanings." Eydar suggests Francis steered the Church from reconciliation with Judaism initiated by predecessors like Pope John XXIII. He introduces a "psycho-theological" interpretation, arguing that the historical persecution of Jews fulfilled a Church-assigned role of eternal victimhood, symbolized by the crucifixion. The establishment of Israel, in this view, represents Jewish self-determination and refusal to be victims ("Jesus has come down from the cross... armed"), a shift Eydar claims Pope Francis "never accepted" and actively opposed through his criticism of Israel's self-defense against Hamas.

Eydar also frames Francis's legacy in terms of the Church's future direction, noting his appointment of numerous cardinals from the Global South holding "progressive, anti-Western, and particularly anti-American and anti-Israeli views." This is contrasted with the conservative camp, including followers of the late Pope Benedict XVI, who identified radical Islam as a primary threat to Western civilization. The article accuses Francis of failing to condemn radical Islam or speak out against the persecution of Christians in the Middle East, alleging he reserved his harshest criticism – likened to medieval "blood libels" – for the Jewish state regarding the children of Gaza.

Concluding with a call for Israeli assertiveness, Eydar argues that sending representation to the funeral would betray the victims of October 7. He maintains that the State of Israel remains a "theological scandal" from a traditional Catholic viewpoint that opposes Jewish sovereignty in the Holy Land, a viewpoint he attributes to the late Pope. The piece ultimately frames Pope Francis's pontificate as detrimental to Jewish-Catholic relations and harmful to Israel's legitimacy and security.

Photo: Wikimedia Commons

Popular posts from this blog

Sovereignty as Spectacle: Turkish Cypriot Researcher Critiques Grand Opening of the Northern Cyprus New "Republican Campus"

On Saturday, the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC), which is not recognized internationally, officially launched its new "Republican Campus." The first construction phase features the new Presidential Building and Parliament Building, inaugurated during a grand ceremony attended by Turkey's President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. Dubbed by critics as a "show of sovereignty," the event, alongside the concurrent Teknofest technology festival, has drawn criticism from Turkish Cypriot researcher-writer Mete Hatay for its political undertones and symbolic messaging. Hatay, a noted peace researcher affiliated with the Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO), argues that the openings were not merely about inaugurating buildings but about constructing symbols of dominance under the guise of sovereignty. Hatay describes the events as meticulously staged platforms for political agendas. "Today in Northern Cyprus, it wasn't just buildings that were opened; symbols w...

Cyprus Archbishop's Easter Message Lost in Translation, Sparking Controversy

A mistranslation of Cyprus' Orthodox Archbishop Georgios' Easter message has ignited a new wave of tensions between Greek and Turkish Cypriot communities on the divided island. Turkish Cypriot media outlets reported that the Archbishop called for "expelling the Turks and saving the homeland," prompting swift condemnation from Turkish Cypriot political figures, including opposition leader Tufan Erhürman. According to Kıbrıs Postası 's bulletin published on April 20, 2025, Archbishop Georgios issued an Easter message urging "Greece, Southern Cyprus, and all Hellenism to make a coordinated effort to expel the Turks and save the homeland." The report further claimed the Archbishop stated there was "no possibility of making any more concessions" in the current situation. In response, Tufan Erhürman , leader of the social democrat Republican Turkish Party (CTP), issued a strongly-worded statement criticizing what he called "discriminatory and pr...

Is Turkey's New Rising Political Star's Future in Danger?

In a development that could dramatically alter Turkey's political landscape, Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality Mayor Ekrem Imamoglu's presidential ambitions face a serious challenge as pro-government sources report his university diploma may soon be invalidated. According to prominent pro-government journalist Abdulkadir Selvi, Istanbul University is expected to complete a report today that could lead to the cancellation of Imamoglu's diploma, effectively disqualifying him from running for president of Turkey. Critical Findings in University Investigation The investigation centers around allegations that Imamoglu's lateral transfer from American University of Kyrenia to Istanbul University violated educational regulations. The Council of Higher Education (YÖK) has already issued a report claiming that American University of Kyrenia was not recognized by YÖK at the time Imamoglu made his transfer. "Istanbul University's investigation has been completed, and the...