Skip to main content

Turkey's Economy at a Crossroads: Rate Hikes Combat Crisis, But Challenges Loom

Turkey's central bank's recent aggressive interest rate hikes have placed the country's economy at a critical juncture, prompting questions about its future trajectory. According to an analysis by Koç University Professor Selva Demiralp, published by BBC Turkish, while the hikes were a necessary response to political turmoil and market pressure, they ushered in a period of significant economic challenges and uncertainty regarding potential scenarios for the nation.

Heightened political tensions around mid-March, linked to legal actions against prominent political figures, acted as a catalyst for a sharp policy shift, according to Demiralp. The Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey (CBRT) responded with significant interest rate hikes, effectively ending an easing cycle initiated last December and bringing the policy rate back towards levels seen previously. This aggressive tightening, culminating in the policy rate reaching nearly 50% after successive increases, came at a considerable cost. Demiralp estimates around $50 billion depletion from the bank's net reserves (excluding swaps) in roughly a month, underscoring a crisis of confidence and rising dollarization as the bank intervened to stabilize the lira.

This erosion of confidence is mirrored in household behavior, as indicated by a Koç University survey cited in the analysis. While overall savings rates increased following the political crisis, there was a 13% jump in the preference for holding foreign currency in April compared to March. The traditional safe-haven asset, gold, also remained popular for savers. Simultaneously, an 8% increase in Turkish Lira deposit holdings suggests the higher interest rates have successfully curbed capital flight, attracting savers seeking both yield and perceived safety amidst rising risks.

A critical question, Demiralp posits, is whether the Turkish economy can withstand what she terms a second "bitter pill" of austerity. The rate cuts initiated last December appeared less driven by an improving inflation outlook – which was already viewed by many analysts as overly optimistic, with revisions expected even before the March turmoil – and more by a desire to alleviate pressure on the real economy. With official annual inflation at 38.1% in March (according to TÜİK, while independent group ENAG reported 75.2%) and inflation expectations deteriorating, the return to tighter monetary policy, while necessary for stability, renews concerns about an economic slowdown.

Signs of strain are already apparent in the real economy. Demiralp highlights a surge in concordato (bankruptcy protection) filings: the 583 filings made in the first quarter of 2025 already represent roughly one-third of the 1,723 filings recorded for all of 2024. Furthermore, while still relatively low by global standards, the non-performing loan ratio for consumer credit is trending upwards, approaching the 3.5-4% range. The banking sector also faces renewed pressure on profit margins due to the higher interest rate environment impacting lending and borrowing costs.

External dynamics add another layer of complexity. Potential global recession risks, exacerbated by factors like US trade policy uncertainties, could negatively impact Turkey's crucial export markets. However, Demiralp notes potential counterbalances: falling global energy prices and a weaker US dollar could relieve the Turkish economy's import bill and competitiveness.

Despite these significant headwinds, Demiralp views a severe "hard landing" scenario as a remote possibility. However, the economic outlook has dimmed. Based on the analysis context, the year-end inflation forecast is now more likely to align with previously considered pessimistic scenarios (around 36% for 2025 year-end), and growth expectations have been revised downwards. While positive growth, perhaps around 2% for 2025, still seems achievable, Demiralp suggests this might be better described not as a soft landing but perhaps more accurately as a "soft stagnation" or a "gentle stall," reflecting an economy struggling to gain momentum amidst tight policy and lingering uncertainty.

Photo: PEXELS

More News

Iran’s Leaderless War Machine: The IRGC’s Autonomous Cells and the Escalation Nobody Controls

In the fog of a war that has already claimed Iran’s supreme leader and its top military brass, a new and perhaps more dangerous threat is emerging from the rubble of Tehran’s shattered command structure: a Revolutionary Guard Corps that, by design, no longer needs orders from above. Sources with direct knowledge of the situation confirm that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) continues to prosecute strikes across the region not under the direction of the new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, but according to pre-programmed autonomous protocols embedded deep within its decentralized “mosaic defense” architecture. The result is a war machine that has become, in the most literal sense, self-propelling — and increasingly difficult for anyone to stop. A New Supreme Leader With Limited Command Mojtaba Khamenei was formally elected Supreme Leader on 8 March 2026, succeeding his father Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in the opening wave of the US-Israeli “Operation Epic Fury...

2026 US/Israel–Iran War Risk: Why the Chance of Escalation Is Meaningfully Elevated

As 2025 closes, the US/Israel–Iran confrontation is no longer a low-grade shadow struggle managed mainly through diplomacy and proxy conflicts ; it is an openly articulated deterrence contest in which leaders have publicly tied credibility to “red lines” and rapid retaliation. President Trump has stated that if Iran rebuilds its nuclear capabilities or continues rebuilding missile capacity , the response could be immediate and more severe—language that reduces room for quiet de-escalation once a new incident occurs.  At the same time, Iran has replied with warnings of harsh consequences for any renewed attacks, reinforcing a mutual-threat environment where misperception and political signaling can substitute for verifiable facts.  Against that backdrop, the key analytical point for 2026 is not whether a “full war” is the default outcome; it is that the probability that a limited clash escalates into a broader, sustained conflict is meaningfully elevated because the stabili...

Iran's Headscarf Rules Quietly Loosen — But No Law Has Changed

Bareheaded women appear openly in Tehran cafés and streets, yet activists warn the shift is fragile and the law remains on the books. Images have been circulating on social media of something that would have been almost unimaginable in Iran just a few years ago: women sipping coffee in Tehran cafés, strolling busy city streets, and sitting in restaurants — all without a headscarf. The scenes have ignited global attention and renewed debate over whether the Islamic Republic is quietly retreating from one of its most defining ideological pillars. For decades, wearing the hijab in public has been mandatory for all women in Iran — a rule enshrined in the Islamic Penal Code since 1983 and treated as a cornerstone of the clerical state established after the 1979 revolution. Violations could result in fines, arrest, or worse. Yet in recent weeks and months, enforcement appears to have noticeably slackened, at least in major urban centres. A Visible Shift on the Streets Reporters and residents...