According to the report, this alleged, unannounced US "veto" on aid is tied to ongoing developments concerning Iran and awaits Lebanon's implementation of specific American economic, political, and security conditions. The sources described the move as part of a "maximum pressure" strategy aimed at eliminating obstacles to a settlement with Lebanon that would end the conflict with Israel, primarily focusing on disarming Hezbollah, regardless of the consequences for Lebanon itself. This policy reportedly mirrors the Israeli position towards Beirut and extends to Syria as well.
While two official Lebanese sources told Al-Akhbar they were unaware of such a directive, two separate political sources affirmed the credibility of the US instructing Gulf states in this manner.
One source close to the Americans suggested the US priority is resolving the broader Arab-Israeli conflict to achieve wider Middle East objectives and counter China, not just serve Israeli interests. Another political source indicated signs of a US plan to obstruct financial support to Lebanon ahead of the 2026 parliamentary elections, anticipating that sustained pressure might cause Lebanese voters to penalize Hezbollah for the difficult economic situation and war outcomes.
The Al-Akhbar report notes that Gulf financial support for Lebanon has been scarce recently. Despite political gestures, Saudi Arabia has not provided direct financial aid following President Joseph Aoun's visit, emphasizing reforms. Qatar has also reportedly held back funds, pausing previous support for the Lebanese Army. This alleged US pressure campaign reflects a complex geopolitical landscape where aid is increasingly tied to strategic alignments and regional power struggles.