The report suggests these emerging structures, while not formally declared ministries in the traditional sense, function similarly, managing portfolios typically associated with state sovereignty. These include foreign relations, defense (embodied by the Syrian Democratic Forces, or SDF), internal security, and potentially justice and finance. The creation and strengthening of these administrative bodies reflect the AANES's ongoing efforts to build governing capacity and provide services in the regions under its control, which were captured from ISIS with coalition support.
However, this assertion of administrative authority occurs within a complex and precarious geopolitical environment. The AANES is not internationally recognized as a sovereign entity, and its political project faces opposition from the Syrian government, which seeks to restore central control, and neighboring Turkey, which views the YPG-dominated SDF as a security threat linked to the PKK. Furthermore, the region grapples with economic challenges, residual ISIS threats, and internal social tensions.
The formation of these "sovereign" administrative bodies points towards a deepening of de facto autonomy in Northeast Syria. While stopping short of declaring independence, these steps signify a determination by the AANES to solidify its governance model. This raises further questions about Syria's future political and administrative map amidst the ongoing conflict and international negotiations. These structures' long-term viability and recognition remain uncertain, contingent on regional power dynamics and the elusive search for a comprehensive political solution in Syria.