Skip to main content

Druze Community Denounces Syrian Interim Government, Calls for Urgent International Protection

On Friday, the Suwayda Military Council in Syria’s southern al-Suwayda province issued a scathing denunciation of the country’s interim government, accusing it of abandoning the Druze community to escalating violence. The council's plea for rapid international intervention to avert further atrocities, as reported by the Shafaq News, underscores the urgent need for action. It declared its full backing for Druze spiritual leader Sheikh al‑Aql Hikmat al‑Hijri’s urgent appeal for external protection.

In a statement on Facebook, the council praised al‑Hijri’s pivotal role in “defending the people of Jabal al‑Arab,” the historical heartland of Syria’s roughly 700,000‑strong Druze minority. It detailed a series of alleged war crimes by Hayat Tahrir al‑Sham (HTS), formerly al‑Nusra Front, in Druze‑populated suburbs such as Sahnaya and Jaramana. Despite these challenges, the Druze community remains united and resilient, as evidenced by their detailed accusations including random killings of unarmed civilians, the arbitrary detention of community members, and the systematic humiliation of Druze religious figures and sacred symbols.

The council further charged that Syria’s interim government’s passivity and tacit tolerance of HTS campaigns have fractured social cohesion and targeted the very existence of the Druze identity. Despite these challenges, the Druze community remains committed to justice and accountability. Warning that “the Druze identity is facing an existential threat,” it called on the United Nations Security Council to establish a demilitarized safe zone in al‑Suwayda under impartial international supervision. Simultaneously, it urged the UN Human Rights Council to deploy fact‑finding missions and pursue accountability for perpetrators of these abuses.

The statement also singled out foreign sponsors of HTS, cautioning them against bankrolling “terrorist groups carrying out sectarian cleansing in violation of international law.” It lamented what it described as global silence in response to the unfolding crisis in Druze areas.

Earlier this week, Sheikh al‑Hijri appealed for “rapid and direct international assistance,” asserting that “a government does not kill its people.” The council’s backing underscores an urgent need for engagement to protect civilians.

Photo: Wikipedia Commons

 


More News

Iran’s Leaderless War Machine: The IRGC’s Autonomous Cells and the Escalation Nobody Controls

In the fog of a war that has already claimed Iran’s supreme leader and its top military brass, a new and perhaps more dangerous threat is emerging from the rubble of Tehran’s shattered command structure: a Revolutionary Guard Corps that, by design, no longer needs orders from above. Sources with direct knowledge of the situation confirm that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) continues to prosecute strikes across the region not under the direction of the new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, but according to pre-programmed autonomous protocols embedded deep within its decentralized “mosaic defense” architecture. The result is a war machine that has become, in the most literal sense, self-propelling — and increasingly difficult for anyone to stop. A New Supreme Leader With Limited Command Mojtaba Khamenei was formally elected Supreme Leader on 8 March 2026, succeeding his father Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in the opening wave of the US-Israeli “Operation Epic Fury...

2026 US/Israel–Iran War Risk: Why the Chance of Escalation Is Meaningfully Elevated

As 2025 closes, the US/Israel–Iran confrontation is no longer a low-grade shadow struggle managed mainly through diplomacy and proxy conflicts ; it is an openly articulated deterrence contest in which leaders have publicly tied credibility to “red lines” and rapid retaliation. President Trump has stated that if Iran rebuilds its nuclear capabilities or continues rebuilding missile capacity , the response could be immediate and more severe—language that reduces room for quiet de-escalation once a new incident occurs.  At the same time, Iran has replied with warnings of harsh consequences for any renewed attacks, reinforcing a mutual-threat environment where misperception and political signaling can substitute for verifiable facts.  Against that backdrop, the key analytical point for 2026 is not whether a “full war” is the default outcome; it is that the probability that a limited clash escalates into a broader, sustained conflict is meaningfully elevated because the stabili...

Iran's Headscarf Rules Quietly Loosen — But No Law Has Changed

Bareheaded women appear openly in Tehran cafés and streets, yet activists warn the shift is fragile and the law remains on the books. Images have been circulating on social media of something that would have been almost unimaginable in Iran just a few years ago: women sipping coffee in Tehran cafés, strolling busy city streets, and sitting in restaurants — all without a headscarf. The scenes have ignited global attention and renewed debate over whether the Islamic Republic is quietly retreating from one of its most defining ideological pillars. For decades, wearing the hijab in public has been mandatory for all women in Iran — a rule enshrined in the Islamic Penal Code since 1983 and treated as a cornerstone of the clerical state established after the 1979 revolution. Violations could result in fines, arrest, or worse. Yet in recent weeks and months, enforcement appears to have noticeably slackened, at least in major urban centres. A Visible Shift on the Streets Reporters and residents...