Skip to main content

Israel's Contrasting Military Strategies: Success in Lebanon, Struggles in Yemen

 

According to a recent analysis published in Asharq Al-Awsat by senior columnist Abdulrahman Al-Rashed, Israel's military operations have shown stark contrasts in effectiveness between Lebanon and Yemen, highlighting significant strategic differences in approach and outcomes.

Israel's campaign against Hezbollah in Lebanon last year has been described as one of its most outstanding military achievements since the Six-Day War of 1967. The 13-month operation demonstrated unprecedented precision and intelligence capabilities, with Israeli forces successfully eliminating most of Hezbollah's top leadership and turning off their offensive arsenal while largely sparing civilian infrastructure.

"During last year's battles in Lebanon, civilian life in most of the country remained nearly normal, and infrastructure wasn't targeted," notes Al-Rashed. This stands in marked contrast to Israel's 2006 Lebanon war, when the country's civilian infrastructure suffered extensive damage, including airports, ports, power stations, and approximately 100 bridges.

The precision of Israel's recent Lebanon operations was so remarkable that photographers and journalists could position themselves to document airstrikes after their announcements, filming targeted buildings from proximity while civilian aircraft continued normal operations at nearby Rafik Hariri International Airport.

However, Israel's military actions against Yemen's Houthi rebels have proven far less effective. Since January, Israel has conducted six strikes against Houthi targets. Still, these operations have been described as "more theatrical than effective" despite the Houthis lacking air defense capabilities or a substantial missile arsenal.

Military analysts cite several factors to explain this disparity. First, Israel likely lacks the extensive intelligence network in Yemen that it has cultivated in Lebanon over decades. Without detailed intelligence, precision targeting becomes significantly more challenging.

"Israel doesn't have a strong target bank in Yemen, which is why it resorted to bombing ports, the airport, and roads to halt the reception and transport of weapons," explains Al-Rashed. This approach mirrors Israel's less successful 2006 Lebanon strategy rather than its more sophisticated 2024 operations.

Another possibility is that Israel may be deliberately limiting its Yemen operations, content with proportional responses to the relatively limited threat posed by Houthi missiles and drones. Most Houthi projectiles have missed their targets or caused only brief disruptions to Israeli air traffic and civilian life.

The Houthi movement itself represents a small minority of Yemen's population—approximately 7 percent—and maintains control through intimidation and tribal alliances. These alliances could quickly dissolve if the group's military strength were to diminish significantly.

Despite their technological displays through drone and missile launches, Al-Rashed characterizes the Houthis as "primitive cave fighters from the Middle Ages" who are "like moths drawn to a flame" in their confrontation with Israel's superior military capabilities.

More News

Iran’s Leaderless War Machine: The IRGC’s Autonomous Cells and the Escalation Nobody Controls

In the fog of a war that has already claimed Iran’s supreme leader and its top military brass, a new and perhaps more dangerous threat is emerging from the rubble of Tehran’s shattered command structure: a Revolutionary Guard Corps that, by design, no longer needs orders from above. Sources with direct knowledge of the situation confirm that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) continues to prosecute strikes across the region not under the direction of the new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, but according to pre-programmed autonomous protocols embedded deep within its decentralized “mosaic defense” architecture. The result is a war machine that has become, in the most literal sense, self-propelling — and increasingly difficult for anyone to stop. A New Supreme Leader With Limited Command Mojtaba Khamenei was formally elected Supreme Leader on 8 March 2026, succeeding his father Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in the opening wave of the US-Israeli “Operation Epic Fury...

2026 US/Israel–Iran War Risk: Why the Chance of Escalation Is Meaningfully Elevated

As 2025 closes, the US/Israel–Iran confrontation is no longer a low-grade shadow struggle managed mainly through diplomacy and proxy conflicts ; it is an openly articulated deterrence contest in which leaders have publicly tied credibility to “red lines” and rapid retaliation. President Trump has stated that if Iran rebuilds its nuclear capabilities or continues rebuilding missile capacity , the response could be immediate and more severe—language that reduces room for quiet de-escalation once a new incident occurs.  At the same time, Iran has replied with warnings of harsh consequences for any renewed attacks, reinforcing a mutual-threat environment where misperception and political signaling can substitute for verifiable facts.  Against that backdrop, the key analytical point for 2026 is not whether a “full war” is the default outcome; it is that the probability that a limited clash escalates into a broader, sustained conflict is meaningfully elevated because the stabili...

Iran's Headscarf Rules Quietly Loosen — But No Law Has Changed

Bareheaded women appear openly in Tehran cafés and streets, yet activists warn the shift is fragile and the law remains on the books. Images have been circulating on social media of something that would have been almost unimaginable in Iran just a few years ago: women sipping coffee in Tehran cafés, strolling busy city streets, and sitting in restaurants — all without a headscarf. The scenes have ignited global attention and renewed debate over whether the Islamic Republic is quietly retreating from one of its most defining ideological pillars. For decades, wearing the hijab in public has been mandatory for all women in Iran — a rule enshrined in the Islamic Penal Code since 1983 and treated as a cornerstone of the clerical state established after the 1979 revolution. Violations could result in fines, arrest, or worse. Yet in recent weeks and months, enforcement appears to have noticeably slackened, at least in major urban centres. A Visible Shift on the Streets Reporters and residents...