Recent Israeli airstrikes on military installations in northwestern Iran have underscored a growing security vacuum in the region, bringing renewed attention to the complex ethnic and political landscape of South Azerbaijan, according to an analysis by Babek Chalabi published in E-International Relations. As the central authority of the Islamic Republic of Iran appears to weaken, questions surrounding territorial control, ethnic self-determination, and regional power dynamics are gaining significant urgency, particularly for the millions of Azerbaijani Turks residing there.
South Azerbaijan, a strategically vital area linking Iran with the Caucasus and Anatolia, is home to a culturally distinct Turkic population that has long navigated a delicate relationship with the Iranian state. Historical grievances stemming from language prohibitions and exclusionary policies by educational and media authorities have marginalized their Turkic identity. The current perceived erosion of state capacity, reportedly highlighted by the bail release of senior military figures, is seen by observers as a potentially transformative juncture for the region's political trajectory.
The interplay of internal instability and external pressures further complicates the situation. Kurdish armed groups, notably PJAK, an affiliate of the PKK, have reportedly increased their activities in West Azerbaijan province. This expansion, particularly near cities like Piranshahr and Oshnavieh, mirrors patterns observed in northern Syria, where Kurdish groups established autonomous zones amidst state collapse, often with indirect international support.
South Azerbaijani activists and strategists, drawing parallels with developments in Syria and Iraq, are reportedly concerned that a prolonged security vacuum could be exploited by militias with ethno-territorial ambitions. A primary concern is the potential formation of a contiguous Kurdish corridor stretching from Sinjar in Iraq to Maku in Iran, a development viewed as a challenge to South Azerbaijan's territorial cohesion and its Turkic demographic character. This anxiety is fueled by some Kurdish political platforms that envision a transnational federation encompassing parts of Iranian Azerbaijan, an idea incompatible with Azerbaijani nationalist aspirations and a potential source of conflict, especially in mixed-ethnicity urban centers like Urmia.
In response, calls for the creation of a South Azerbaijan National Defence Front are reportedly intensifying. Proponents advocate for proactive contingency planning, including the organization of local defense units, the establishment of emergency governance councils, and diplomatic engagement with international actors, notably Turkey and the Republic of Azerbaijan. Turkey, a NATO member with a history of operations against Kurdish groups, has a strategic interest in preventing a contiguous Kurdish zone on its eastern border. The Republic of Azerbaijan, following its recent military successes, may also view the situation through a lens of Turkic solidarity and strategic opportunity.
However, according to Chalabi, the path to an autonomous or independent Azerbaijani entity in northwest Iran is fraught with challenges. The region's ethnic pluralism necessitates robust protections for minority rights within any new political structure. Furthermore, gaining international recognition for new states emerging from conflict is a complex and often contentious process. Analysts warn that without clear legal frameworks, transitional justice, and inclusive political representation, any move towards autonomy could risk devolving into new forms of instability.
Map: Wikimedia Commons