Skip to main content

TLF Special: Kabul Vows Retaliation. Taliban Blames "Rogue Military Circle" for Deadly Pakistani Airstrikes

The so-called Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan (IEA) has issued a severe warning to Islamabad following a series of overnight airstrikes targeting Khost, Paktika, and Kunar provinces. The attacks, which Kabul characterizes as a flagrant violation of national sovereignty, have deepened the geopolitical rift between the two neighbors, with Taliban leadership promising a calculated response to what they term an "unforgivable crime."

In an interview aired on TOLOnews, IEA spokesperson Zabiullah Mujahid addressed the escalating crisis during the Farakhabar program. Mujahid confirmed the grim toll of the strikes, stating that ten civilians were "martyred," including one woman and nine children, while eight others sustained injuries. "The people of Afghanistan are determined to protect their land," Mujahid asserted, warning that the defense of the country’s airspace is a legitimate right and that a response will be delivered "at the appropriate and necessary time."

The strikes come amidst a backdrop of rising insecurity in Pakistan, which Islamabad frequently blames on militants operating from Afghan soil—a charge Kabul vehemently denies. Mujahid rejected the logic that Afghan civilians were responsible for security failures within Pakistan, specifically referencing recent incidents in Peshawar. Instead, he argued that Pakistan’s security apparatus is attempting to deflect attention from its own internal incompetence. "To cover up their own security forces' weakness... they commit such crimes," Mujahid stated, suggesting that the Pakistani military is scapegoating Afghanistan to justify its massive budget and lack of results.

Notably, Mujahid drew a sharp distinction between the Pakistani nation and what he termed a "specific military circle" within the Pakistan Army. He alleged that this faction is acting on "orders from an external side," behaving as "mercenary killers" to destabilize the region for the benefit of foreign powers. "They have adopted a policy to engage in enmity with Afghanistan... to lift the blame of Pakistan's tensions and problems from their own military shoulders," he explained.

When pressed on whether military retaliation is on the table, Mujahid remained ambiguous but firm, noting that while security measures are classified, "the response must be given in the same manner that they took action." He emphasized that while the IEA does not seek war, they will not remain passive in the face of aggression.

Diplomatic channels appear to be fraying rapidly. Mujahid revealed that negotiations between Kabul and Islamabad are currently suspended, accusing the Pakistani delegation of "wasting time" during previous talks in Turkey. While acknowledging reports of a potential upcoming visit by a Turkish delegation to mediate, Mujahid expressed skepticism, noting that previous mediation efforts failed because Pakistan was not interested in a "real solution."

As tensions mount along the Durand Line, the IEA maintains that the "main loser" of this conflict will be the instigators within Pakistan. "We were not the starters of war," Mujahid concluded, "but unfortunately, our soil has been subjected to aggression." 

More News

Iran’s Leaderless War Machine: The IRGC’s Autonomous Cells and the Escalation Nobody Controls

In the fog of a war that has already claimed Iran’s supreme leader and its top military brass, a new and perhaps more dangerous threat is emerging from the rubble of Tehran’s shattered command structure: a Revolutionary Guard Corps that, by design, no longer needs orders from above. Sources with direct knowledge of the situation confirm that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) continues to prosecute strikes across the region not under the direction of the new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, but according to pre-programmed autonomous protocols embedded deep within its decentralized “mosaic defense” architecture. The result is a war machine that has become, in the most literal sense, self-propelling — and increasingly difficult for anyone to stop. A New Supreme Leader With Limited Command Mojtaba Khamenei was formally elected Supreme Leader on 8 March 2026, succeeding his father Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in the opening wave of the US-Israeli “Operation Epic Fury...

2026 US/Israel–Iran War Risk: Why the Chance of Escalation Is Meaningfully Elevated

As 2025 closes, the US/Israel–Iran confrontation is no longer a low-grade shadow struggle managed mainly through diplomacy and proxy conflicts ; it is an openly articulated deterrence contest in which leaders have publicly tied credibility to “red lines” and rapid retaliation. President Trump has stated that if Iran rebuilds its nuclear capabilities or continues rebuilding missile capacity , the response could be immediate and more severe—language that reduces room for quiet de-escalation once a new incident occurs.  At the same time, Iran has replied with warnings of harsh consequences for any renewed attacks, reinforcing a mutual-threat environment where misperception and political signaling can substitute for verifiable facts.  Against that backdrop, the key analytical point for 2026 is not whether a “full war” is the default outcome; it is that the probability that a limited clash escalates into a broader, sustained conflict is meaningfully elevated because the stabili...

Iran's Headscarf Rules Quietly Loosen — But No Law Has Changed

Bareheaded women appear openly in Tehran cafés and streets, yet activists warn the shift is fragile and the law remains on the books. Images have been circulating on social media of something that would have been almost unimaginable in Iran just a few years ago: women sipping coffee in Tehran cafés, strolling busy city streets, and sitting in restaurants — all without a headscarf. The scenes have ignited global attention and renewed debate over whether the Islamic Republic is quietly retreating from one of its most defining ideological pillars. For decades, wearing the hijab in public has been mandatory for all women in Iran — a rule enshrined in the Islamic Penal Code since 1983 and treated as a cornerstone of the clerical state established after the 1979 revolution. Violations could result in fines, arrest, or worse. Yet in recent weeks and months, enforcement appears to have noticeably slackened, at least in major urban centres. A Visible Shift on the Streets Reporters and residents...