Skip to main content

Hezbollah Reaffirms Refusal to Disarm, Rejects U.S. Pressure

In a renewed show of defiance to both domestic and international pressure, MP Hussein al-Hajj Hassan, head of the Baalbek–Hermel parliamentary bloc, declared that Hezbollah’s weapons “will neither be handed over nor dismantled,” reiterating the party’s long-held position that its arsenal is non-negotiable.  

According to the Al Akhbar, speaking at a ceremony in Baalbek marking the first anniversary of the death of former Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah, Hajj Hassan maintained that far from being weakened, the resistance movement had emerged “more determined, resilient, and steadfast” despite the loss of senior figures and militants. “The resistance today demonstrates greater loyalty and stronger bonds with Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah and his legacy,” he affirmed.  

The MP dismissed mounting regional and Western calls to disarm Hezbollah, arguing that the real threat lies not in the group’s weapons, but in “Israel’s aggression and America’s hegemonic projects.” Addressing comments by U.S. envoy Tom Barak, Hajj Hassan said Washington had abandoned pretense and laid bare its agenda: “from an illusory peace, to redrawing borders, to explicitly supporting Israel’s expansionist ambitions.”  

He accused the United States of seeking to fuel divisions within Lebanon and the wider region, stressing that any weapons supplied by Washington are designed not to confront Israel but to ignite internal strife. “Do not be deceived by America’s rhetoric, nor dragged into its illusions,” he warned, accusing Washington of being fully aligned with Israel’s strategic aims.  

Hajj Hassan pointed in particular to statements by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu regarding a vision of “Greater Israel,” which he described as a colonial project driven by American patronage. According to him, the real confrontation facing the region is not between its people but against the existential threat posed by Israel’s expansionist ideology and the continuing erosion of Palestinian rights.  

He emphasized that Lebanese debates over Hezbollah’s arms miss the real point: “This issue is not the country’s problem. The true problem lies in confronting the Zionist enemy and resisting its ambitions.”  

By reiterating Hezbollah’s refusal to compromise on its arsenal, the Baalbek message was clear. In a time of simmering economic crisis and political discord, the party stresses that disarmament is not up for discussion and that any attempt to prioritize it only distracts from what it considers the pressing danger: Israel’s ongoing threats to Lebanon, Palestine, and the wider Arab world.   

Photo: BBC News/AFP

More News

Iran’s Leaderless War Machine: The IRGC’s Autonomous Cells and the Escalation Nobody Controls

In the fog of a war that has already claimed Iran’s supreme leader and its top military brass, a new and perhaps more dangerous threat is emerging from the rubble of Tehran’s shattered command structure: a Revolutionary Guard Corps that, by design, no longer needs orders from above. Sources with direct knowledge of the situation confirm that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) continues to prosecute strikes across the region not under the direction of the new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, but according to pre-programmed autonomous protocols embedded deep within its decentralized “mosaic defense” architecture. The result is a war machine that has become, in the most literal sense, self-propelling — and increasingly difficult for anyone to stop. A New Supreme Leader With Limited Command Mojtaba Khamenei was formally elected Supreme Leader on 8 March 2026, succeeding his father Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in the opening wave of the US-Israeli “Operation Epic Fury...

2026 US/Israel–Iran War Risk: Why the Chance of Escalation Is Meaningfully Elevated

As 2025 closes, the US/Israel–Iran confrontation is no longer a low-grade shadow struggle managed mainly through diplomacy and proxy conflicts ; it is an openly articulated deterrence contest in which leaders have publicly tied credibility to “red lines” and rapid retaliation. President Trump has stated that if Iran rebuilds its nuclear capabilities or continues rebuilding missile capacity , the response could be immediate and more severe—language that reduces room for quiet de-escalation once a new incident occurs.  At the same time, Iran has replied with warnings of harsh consequences for any renewed attacks, reinforcing a mutual-threat environment where misperception and political signaling can substitute for verifiable facts.  Against that backdrop, the key analytical point for 2026 is not whether a “full war” is the default outcome; it is that the probability that a limited clash escalates into a broader, sustained conflict is meaningfully elevated because the stabili...

Iran's Headscarf Rules Quietly Loosen — But No Law Has Changed

Bareheaded women appear openly in Tehran cafés and streets, yet activists warn the shift is fragile and the law remains on the books. Images have been circulating on social media of something that would have been almost unimaginable in Iran just a few years ago: women sipping coffee in Tehran cafés, strolling busy city streets, and sitting in restaurants — all without a headscarf. The scenes have ignited global attention and renewed debate over whether the Islamic Republic is quietly retreating from one of its most defining ideological pillars. For decades, wearing the hijab in public has been mandatory for all women in Iran — a rule enshrined in the Islamic Penal Code since 1983 and treated as a cornerstone of the clerical state established after the 1979 revolution. Violations could result in fines, arrest, or worse. Yet in recent weeks and months, enforcement appears to have noticeably slackened, at least in major urban centres. A Visible Shift on the Streets Reporters and residents...