Skip to main content

Far-Right Ministers Threaten to Topple Israeli Government Over Gaza Ceasefire Deal

The stability of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government is hanging in the balance as key far-right coalition partners have threatened to resign if a proposed Gaza ceasefire and hostage release deal, backed by the United States, is accepted. National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich have publicly declared their opposition to the plan, arguing it would be a "national defeat" that leaves Hamas in power.

The ultimatum from the two hardline ministers came after a meeting with Netanyahu to discuss the 20-point plan presented by the U.S. President Donald Trump to end the nearly two-year-long war. According to a Jerusalem Post article,  both ministers warned that the deal risked leaving Hamas’s governing and military capabilities intact, a scenario they deem unacceptable following the October 7 massacre.

In a direct challenge to the Prime Minister, Ben-Gvir stated that his Otzma Yehudit party "will no longer be part of the government" if Hamas continues to exist after the release of all hostages. He framed the potential agreement as a "global disgrace" and a "ticking bomb for the next massacre." Smotrich echoed these sentiments, calling the decision to halt the Israeli offensive in Gaza for negotiations a "grave mistake." He argued the pause would allow Hamas to stall for time and would erode Israel's leverage in achieving its primary war aim of eliminating the terrorist organization.

The proposed deal has created a deep rift within the Israeli political landscape. While the far-right flank of the government views it as a capitulation, others see it as a necessary step to secure the return of the remaining hostages. The Hostage and Missing Families Forum sharply criticized Smotrich’s stance, asserting that the state's priority should be the swift return of their loved ones. President Isaac Herzog has also voiced his support for the deal, urging Netanyahu to advance the plan and emphasizing the "historic moments of opportunity" for regional transformation.

As negotiations are expected to continue in Egypt, Netanyahu is under immense pressure from all sides. He must navigate the demands of his far-right partners, the desperate pleas of hostage families, and the diplomatic push from the United States. Minister of Agriculture Avi Dichter has already accused Hamas of making "unreasonable demands," further complicating the delicate talks The coming days will be critical in determining not only the fate of the ceasefire and the hostages but also the survival of Netanyahu’s governing coalition.

Photo: Gemini AI



 

More News

Iran’s Leaderless War Machine: The IRGC’s Autonomous Cells and the Escalation Nobody Controls

In the fog of a war that has already claimed Iran’s supreme leader and its top military brass, a new and perhaps more dangerous threat is emerging from the rubble of Tehran’s shattered command structure: a Revolutionary Guard Corps that, by design, no longer needs orders from above. Sources with direct knowledge of the situation confirm that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) continues to prosecute strikes across the region not under the direction of the new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, but according to pre-programmed autonomous protocols embedded deep within its decentralized “mosaic defense” architecture. The result is a war machine that has become, in the most literal sense, self-propelling — and increasingly difficult for anyone to stop. A New Supreme Leader With Limited Command Mojtaba Khamenei was formally elected Supreme Leader on 8 March 2026, succeeding his father Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in the opening wave of the US-Israeli “Operation Epic Fury...

2026 US/Israel–Iran War Risk: Why the Chance of Escalation Is Meaningfully Elevated

As 2025 closes, the US/Israel–Iran confrontation is no longer a low-grade shadow struggle managed mainly through diplomacy and proxy conflicts ; it is an openly articulated deterrence contest in which leaders have publicly tied credibility to “red lines” and rapid retaliation. President Trump has stated that if Iran rebuilds its nuclear capabilities or continues rebuilding missile capacity , the response could be immediate and more severe—language that reduces room for quiet de-escalation once a new incident occurs.  At the same time, Iran has replied with warnings of harsh consequences for any renewed attacks, reinforcing a mutual-threat environment where misperception and political signaling can substitute for verifiable facts.  Against that backdrop, the key analytical point for 2026 is not whether a “full war” is the default outcome; it is that the probability that a limited clash escalates into a broader, sustained conflict is meaningfully elevated because the stabili...

Iran's Headscarf Rules Quietly Loosen — But No Law Has Changed

Bareheaded women appear openly in Tehran cafés and streets, yet activists warn the shift is fragile and the law remains on the books. Images have been circulating on social media of something that would have been almost unimaginable in Iran just a few years ago: women sipping coffee in Tehran cafés, strolling busy city streets, and sitting in restaurants — all without a headscarf. The scenes have ignited global attention and renewed debate over whether the Islamic Republic is quietly retreating from one of its most defining ideological pillars. For decades, wearing the hijab in public has been mandatory for all women in Iran — a rule enshrined in the Islamic Penal Code since 1983 and treated as a cornerstone of the clerical state established after the 1979 revolution. Violations could result in fines, arrest, or worse. Yet in recent weeks and months, enforcement appears to have noticeably slackened, at least in major urban centres. A Visible Shift on the Streets Reporters and residents...