Skip to main content

Greek Communist Daily Warns U.S.–Backed LNG Deals ‘Smell of War’


Greece’s rapid transformation into a regional gateway for U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG) is drawing sharp criticism from the country’s communist opposition, which warns that the new energy architecture ties the country more deeply to dangerous geopolitical rivalries rather than enhancing “security” and “stability” in Southeast Europe.

An opinion column published in the Rizospastis, the Communist Party of Greece’s (KKE) newspaper, argues that the narrative of safety around U.S.–Greek energy agreements is “a bad joke” in a region already aflame with imperialist competition. The intervention comes days after Athens hosted the Transatlantic Energy Cooperation Conference (P‑TEC), attended by senior U.S. officials and energy executives. There, American representatives and Greek government figures promoted Greece’s role as an “entry gate” for U.S. LNG into Europe, framing it as a pillar of regional stability and a tool for peace in Ukraine. One argument heard at the meeting, echoed in *Rizospastis*’ report, was that flooding the European market with U.S. LNG would hasten an end to the war by inflicting irreversible damage on Russia’s energy‑dependent economy. The communist daily dismisses attempts to present Washington as a “peace‑maker” and U.S. gas as an “olive branch.”

At the heart of the dispute lies the so‑called Vertical Gas Corridor, a north–south route running through Greece, Bulgaria and Romania that is designed to move non‑Russian gas into Central and Eastern Europe. Initially outlined in 2014 under the Samaras government, amid the U.S.–EU‑backed political upheaval in Ukraine, the project was later advanced by the SYRIZA–ANEL coalition and then by the current New Democracy administration. Speaking at P‑TEC, Bulgartransgaz chief executive Vlad Malinov underlined the scale of the shift under way, noting that “five to six years ago, the whole region was almost fully dependent on Russian gas.”

A flagship element of this corridor is the new floating storage and regasification unit (FSRU) off Alexandroupolis in northern Greece. Investments in the terminal began while Bulgaria was still “full” of Russian gas, *Rizospastis* notes, but gained momentum after the decision to proceed at the end of 2021. Construction started in May 2022, just months after Russia’s full‑scale invasion of Ukraine and shortly before the unexplained explosions that crippled the Nord Stream pipelines in September 2022, effectively shutting down one of the main routes for Russian gas to the EU.

The newspaper places these regional developments within a broader U.S. strategy to secure “energy dominance” in the global LNG market. Citing figures from the U.S. Energy Information Administration, it recalls that the United States became a net exporter of natural gas in 2017, after the shale gas boom and the conversion of terminals such as Sabine Pass in Louisiana from import to export use. By 2022, with additional facilities like Cove Point (Maryland), Corpus Christi and Freeport (Texas), Cameron (Louisiana), Elba Island (Georgia) and Calcasieu Pass (Louisiana) online, U.S. LNG export capacity had reached roughly 75–80 million tonnes annually, making the country the world’s largest LNG exporter.

According to Rizospastis, this U.S. “energy supremacy” is not a neutral market development but “a structural element” of the struggle for primacy in the global imperialist system, aimed foremost at severing NATO‑aligned Europe from Russian energy and reshaping ties between Russia and China. The paper argues that the process is being enforced “through fire and iron” – wars, sanctions and escalating confrontations both between rival power blocs and within the Euro‑Atlantic alliance itself.

While the Greek government and business groups hail LNG projects as a guarantee of supply security, new revenues and geopolitical upgrading, the KKE‑aligned daily warns that the deals signed with Washington are more likely to become “the starting point of new and bigger conflicts,” further dragging Greece and its people into perilous confrontations. The only real safeguard for peace, it concludes, lies in opposing imperialist plans, disengaging the country from wars and ultimately overturning the capitalist system that fuels them. 

Photo: Gemini AI

More News

Iran’s Leaderless War Machine: The IRGC’s Autonomous Cells and the Escalation Nobody Controls

In the fog of a war that has already claimed Iran’s supreme leader and its top military brass, a new and perhaps more dangerous threat is emerging from the rubble of Tehran’s shattered command structure: a Revolutionary Guard Corps that, by design, no longer needs orders from above. Sources with direct knowledge of the situation confirm that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) continues to prosecute strikes across the region not under the direction of the new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, but according to pre-programmed autonomous protocols embedded deep within its decentralized “mosaic defense” architecture. The result is a war machine that has become, in the most literal sense, self-propelling — and increasingly difficult for anyone to stop. A New Supreme Leader With Limited Command Mojtaba Khamenei was formally elected Supreme Leader on 8 March 2026, succeeding his father Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in the opening wave of the US-Israeli “Operation Epic Fury...

2026 US/Israel–Iran War Risk: Why the Chance of Escalation Is Meaningfully Elevated

As 2025 closes, the US/Israel–Iran confrontation is no longer a low-grade shadow struggle managed mainly through diplomacy and proxy conflicts ; it is an openly articulated deterrence contest in which leaders have publicly tied credibility to “red lines” and rapid retaliation. President Trump has stated that if Iran rebuilds its nuclear capabilities or continues rebuilding missile capacity , the response could be immediate and more severe—language that reduces room for quiet de-escalation once a new incident occurs.  At the same time, Iran has replied with warnings of harsh consequences for any renewed attacks, reinforcing a mutual-threat environment where misperception and political signaling can substitute for verifiable facts.  Against that backdrop, the key analytical point for 2026 is not whether a “full war” is the default outcome; it is that the probability that a limited clash escalates into a broader, sustained conflict is meaningfully elevated because the stabili...

Iran's Headscarf Rules Quietly Loosen — But No Law Has Changed

Bareheaded women appear openly in Tehran cafés and streets, yet activists warn the shift is fragile and the law remains on the books. Images have been circulating on social media of something that would have been almost unimaginable in Iran just a few years ago: women sipping coffee in Tehran cafés, strolling busy city streets, and sitting in restaurants — all without a headscarf. The scenes have ignited global attention and renewed debate over whether the Islamic Republic is quietly retreating from one of its most defining ideological pillars. For decades, wearing the hijab in public has been mandatory for all women in Iran — a rule enshrined in the Islamic Penal Code since 1983 and treated as a cornerstone of the clerical state established after the 1979 revolution. Violations could result in fines, arrest, or worse. Yet in recent weeks and months, enforcement appears to have noticeably slackened, at least in major urban centres. A Visible Shift on the Streets Reporters and residents...