Skip to main content

The Unstoppable Tide: Femicide and the Retreat from Women's Rights in Turkey

The phenomenon of femicide—the killing of women and girls because of their gender—has become a grim, relentless tide in Turkey, particularly over the last five years. Far from being isolated incidents, these murders are symptomatic of deep-seated societal, political, and legal failures. From 2020 to 2024, civil society groups like the We Will Stop Femicide Platform (KCDP) have documented hundreds of cases annually, with the numbers remaining tragically high. This persistent violence demands a multidimensional analysis that moves beyond simple crime statistics to examine the political, legal, and cultural forces at play.


The Political and Legal Retreat

The most significant political development impacting women's safety was Turkey’s unilateral withdrawal from the Istanbul Convention in July 2021. This landmark Council of Europe treaty was designed to prevent violence against women, protect victims, and prosecute perpetrators. The withdrawal, driven by conservative political backlash, was a devastating blow to women’s rights advocates.

The immediate aftermath saw a notable increase in violence and a rise in "suspicious female deaths," often masked as suicides or accidents like "falls from a height." Research covering the period from January 2020 to June 2023 indicates that the proportion of victims who were employed, had children, and had previously sought legal protection rose significantly. This suggests that the withdrawal did not just remove a legal framework; it signaled a political tolerance for violence, emboldening perpetrators and undermining the protective mechanisms for women actively trying to escape abuse.

The Cultural and Societal Dimensions

Femicide in Turkey is deeply rooted in a patriarchal culture that enforces rigid gender roles and views women as property. The primary motives cited by perpetrators often revolve around women seeking divorce, refusing reconciliation, or making independent life decisions. This is often described as a "masculine backlash" against women's increasing autonomy and participation in public life.

The media's portrayal of these crimes further exacerbates the problem. Sensationalist reporting often focuses on the victim's behavior or clothing, effectively shifting the blame away from the perpetrator and the systemic failures that enabled the murder. This cultural normalization of violence is a powerful barrier to change, reinforcing the idea that a man's "honor" or authority justifies violence.

The Failure of the Justice System

While Turkey has domestic laws, such as Law No. 6284, aimed at protecting women, their implementation is often weak and inconsistent. Activists frequently point to the failure of the justice system to enforce restraining orders, provide adequate shelter, and apply deterrent sentences. Perpetrators often benefit from "good conduct" reductions in sentencing, which are seen as an insult to the victims and their families.

Furthermore, the government’s reluctance to publish comprehensive, official statistics on femicide has created a data vacuum, leaving civil society organizations to shoulder the burden of documentation. This lack of transparency is a political choice that obscures the true scale of the crisis and hinders effective policy-making.

The fight against femicide in Turkey is therefore a struggle on multiple fronts: a battle for legal protection, a cultural war against patriarchy, and a political demand for accountability. The resilience of women's rights organizations, despite facing legal challenges and political pressure, remains a crucial bulwark against this violence. They continue to demand the full implementation of Law No. 6284 and the immediate reinstatement of the Istanbul Convention. Until the state fully commits to these protective measures and reverses the political retreat from international standards, the tragic, unstoppable tide of femicide will continue to claim the lives of women across the country, a stark reminder of the cost of political inaction and societal indifference.

Photo: Manus AI


More News

Iran’s Leaderless War Machine: The IRGC’s Autonomous Cells and the Escalation Nobody Controls

In the fog of a war that has already claimed Iran’s supreme leader and its top military brass, a new and perhaps more dangerous threat is emerging from the rubble of Tehran’s shattered command structure: a Revolutionary Guard Corps that, by design, no longer needs orders from above. Sources with direct knowledge of the situation confirm that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) continues to prosecute strikes across the region not under the direction of the new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, but according to pre-programmed autonomous protocols embedded deep within its decentralized “mosaic defense” architecture. The result is a war machine that has become, in the most literal sense, self-propelling — and increasingly difficult for anyone to stop. A New Supreme Leader With Limited Command Mojtaba Khamenei was formally elected Supreme Leader on 8 March 2026, succeeding his father Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in the opening wave of the US-Israeli “Operation Epic Fury...

2026 US/Israel–Iran War Risk: Why the Chance of Escalation Is Meaningfully Elevated

As 2025 closes, the US/Israel–Iran confrontation is no longer a low-grade shadow struggle managed mainly through diplomacy and proxy conflicts ; it is an openly articulated deterrence contest in which leaders have publicly tied credibility to “red lines” and rapid retaliation. President Trump has stated that if Iran rebuilds its nuclear capabilities or continues rebuilding missile capacity , the response could be immediate and more severe—language that reduces room for quiet de-escalation once a new incident occurs.  At the same time, Iran has replied with warnings of harsh consequences for any renewed attacks, reinforcing a mutual-threat environment where misperception and political signaling can substitute for verifiable facts.  Against that backdrop, the key analytical point for 2026 is not whether a “full war” is the default outcome; it is that the probability that a limited clash escalates into a broader, sustained conflict is meaningfully elevated because the stabili...

Iran's Headscarf Rules Quietly Loosen — But No Law Has Changed

Bareheaded women appear openly in Tehran cafés and streets, yet activists warn the shift is fragile and the law remains on the books. Images have been circulating on social media of something that would have been almost unimaginable in Iran just a few years ago: women sipping coffee in Tehran cafés, strolling busy city streets, and sitting in restaurants — all without a headscarf. The scenes have ignited global attention and renewed debate over whether the Islamic Republic is quietly retreating from one of its most defining ideological pillars. For decades, wearing the hijab in public has been mandatory for all women in Iran — a rule enshrined in the Islamic Penal Code since 1983 and treated as a cornerstone of the clerical state established after the 1979 revolution. Violations could result in fines, arrest, or worse. Yet in recent weeks and months, enforcement appears to have noticeably slackened, at least in major urban centres. A Visible Shift on the Streets Reporters and residents...