Skip to main content

US, Israel Reach Understanding on Syria Operations as Washington Pushes Damascus Dialogue

Israel and the United States have reached new understandings that would allow Israel to continue operating in Syria against what it calls security threats, while keeping open a negotiating track with Damascus toward a possible security arrangement, according to Israel’s public broadcaster KAN.

The development follows a meeting between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and US Special Envoy to Syria Thomas Barrack on Monday, Dec. 15, as reported by Enab Baldi. The report said the talks focused on defining “red lines” for Israeli activity in Syria and clarifying what each side expects from the other.

A source cited by KAN said both sides now “understand what is required,” suggesting the discussions aimed to reduce friction between Israeli strikes or raids and broader US diplomatic efforts in the country. KAN also reported that Barrack carried direct messages from US President Donald Trump to Netanyahu, with Syria at the top of the agenda.

According to the broadcaster, the Trump administration views Syria’s transitional president, Ahmed al-Sharaa, as a partner trying to stabilize the country and steer it toward economic and political progress. On that basis, Washington is seeking to avoid moves it believes could endanger the continuation of al-Sharaa’s rule.

Barrack has publicly voiced confidence that Syrians and Israelis can reach an agreement, beginning with security and border arrangements and potentially advancing toward normalization. In comments to *The National* published on Dec. 5, he said Syrians understand that “part of the solution” lies in an agreement with Israel, even as “enemy fighters” attempt to obstruct progress. He also said Damascus is working hard toward peace.

The envoy added that Syria’s government has been “fully cooperative” with Washington on matters related to Israel and is doing what the US administration is asking. At the same time, Barrack suggested Israel’s distrust of the US administration has made it more cautious, slowing momentum on the file.

Trump, for his part, has urged Israel to maintain what he called a “strong and honest dialogue” with Syria, warning against steps that could “disrupt Syria’s development into a prosperous state.” He has also praised al-Sharaa for “working hard” to produce “positive results” and for laying the groundwork for what Trump described as a “long and prosperous relationship” between Syria and Israel.

In a Truth Social post on Dec. 1, Trump said the United States was “doing everything it can” to support Syria’s efforts to become a “truly prosperous state,” and argued that his decision to end “strong and harsh sanctions” significantly helped the Syrian government—moves he said were welcomed by Syria’s leadership and people.

However, the diplomatic track has faced headwinds. A US official told Israel’s Channel 12 that Washington believes Israeli behavior in Syria is harming American efforts to advance a security agreement between the two countries.

The push for an understanding accelerated after Trump met al-Sharaa at the White House on Nov. 10. Reuters quoted Trump afterward as saying the US would do everything possible “to make Syria succeed,” and that Washington was working with Israel to reach an understanding with Syria—framing Syria as a “very important” part of a Middle East he said was “enjoying peace.”

More News

Iran’s Leaderless War Machine: The IRGC’s Autonomous Cells and the Escalation Nobody Controls

In the fog of a war that has already claimed Iran’s supreme leader and its top military brass, a new and perhaps more dangerous threat is emerging from the rubble of Tehran’s shattered command structure: a Revolutionary Guard Corps that, by design, no longer needs orders from above. Sources with direct knowledge of the situation confirm that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) continues to prosecute strikes across the region not under the direction of the new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, but according to pre-programmed autonomous protocols embedded deep within its decentralized “mosaic defense” architecture. The result is a war machine that has become, in the most literal sense, self-propelling — and increasingly difficult for anyone to stop. A New Supreme Leader With Limited Command Mojtaba Khamenei was formally elected Supreme Leader on 8 March 2026, succeeding his father Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in the opening wave of the US-Israeli “Operation Epic Fury...

2026 US/Israel–Iran War Risk: Why the Chance of Escalation Is Meaningfully Elevated

As 2025 closes, the US/Israel–Iran confrontation is no longer a low-grade shadow struggle managed mainly through diplomacy and proxy conflicts ; it is an openly articulated deterrence contest in which leaders have publicly tied credibility to “red lines” and rapid retaliation. President Trump has stated that if Iran rebuilds its nuclear capabilities or continues rebuilding missile capacity , the response could be immediate and more severe—language that reduces room for quiet de-escalation once a new incident occurs.  At the same time, Iran has replied with warnings of harsh consequences for any renewed attacks, reinforcing a mutual-threat environment where misperception and political signaling can substitute for verifiable facts.  Against that backdrop, the key analytical point for 2026 is not whether a “full war” is the default outcome; it is that the probability that a limited clash escalates into a broader, sustained conflict is meaningfully elevated because the stabili...

Iran's Headscarf Rules Quietly Loosen — But No Law Has Changed

Bareheaded women appear openly in Tehran cafés and streets, yet activists warn the shift is fragile and the law remains on the books. Images have been circulating on social media of something that would have been almost unimaginable in Iran just a few years ago: women sipping coffee in Tehran cafés, strolling busy city streets, and sitting in restaurants — all without a headscarf. The scenes have ignited global attention and renewed debate over whether the Islamic Republic is quietly retreating from one of its most defining ideological pillars. For decades, wearing the hijab in public has been mandatory for all women in Iran — a rule enshrined in the Islamic Penal Code since 1983 and treated as a cornerstone of the clerical state established after the 1979 revolution. Violations could result in fines, arrest, or worse. Yet in recent weeks and months, enforcement appears to have noticeably slackened, at least in major urban centres. A Visible Shift on the Streets Reporters and residents...