Skip to main content

Kurdish Forces Complete Withdrawal from Aleppo Following Days of Intense Clashes

The Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) have completed their withdrawal from Aleppo, marking the end of a significant military confrontation that has reshaped the political landscape in Syria's second-largest city. According to Aleppo Governor Azzam al-Gharib, the final SDF fighters departed early on Sunday following a ceasefire agreement negotiated with international mediation.

The Conflict and Casualties

The clashes, which began on January 6, represent some of the most intense fighting since the ousting of former president Bashar al-Assad in December 2024. The conflict erupted in the predominantly Kurdish neighborhoods of Sheikh Maqsoud, Ashrafieh, and Bani Zaid, resulting in significant casualties. The Aleppo Health Directorate confirmed at least 23 fatalities and 104 injuries, though some reports suggest higher numbers.

The violence centered around the breakdown of a March 2025 agreement designed to integrate the SDF into the Syrian national army. With the deadline passing at the end of 2025, negotiations stalled as Kurdish fighters refused to vacate areas they have controlled since the beginning of the Syrian civil war in 2011.

Evacuation and Displacement

The military operations triggered a massive humanitarian crisis. According to UN relief assessments, approximately 148,000 to 180,000 individuals have been displaced from the affected neighborhoods. Civilians were urged to evacuate through humanitarian corridors, with the majority fleeing to the Afrin district and other host communities. The UN reported that over 14 collective shelters in Aleppo City were housing more than 2,500 displaced individuals, with additional hundreds of thousands accommodated in the Afrin District.

Syrian government forces evacuated more than 400 Kurdish fighters from Sheikh Maqsoud to the SDF's de facto autonomous zone in northeastern Syria, while an interior ministry official confirmed that 300 other Kurds, including members of the security forces, were detained.

Infrastructure and Humanitarian Impact

The fighting has caused severe damage to critical civilian infrastructure. The Al-Shahid Khalid Fajr Hospital in Sheikh Maqsood was repeatedly struck by government drone strikes and artillery, forcing it out of service and creating dire conditions for medical care. The Babiri water station in eastern Aleppo countryside suspended operations, posing the risk of a water crisis affecting 3 million residents should the station remain inactive for more than 24 hours.

Multiple government and health facilities sustained damage during the clashes, with four hospitals reported as damaged or non-operational. A curfew remains in effect in affected areas, and public services have been suspended. The Ministry of Education announced a suspension of school activities for an additional 15 days.

The Ceasefire Agreement

The ceasefire agreement, facilitated by international mediators, included provisions for the evacuation of both civilians and fighters. SDF commander Mazloum Abdi stated that the agreement reached a consensus on ceasefire arrangements and safe passage of the wounded, stranded civilians, and remaining fighters to northern and eastern Syria.

Despite the ceasefire declaration, the situation remains fluid with both sides accusing each other of violations. The Syrian government maintains that some SDF factions continue to resist, while Kurdish sources have rejected claims of Syrian army victory, describing official statements as part of a "systematic misinformation campaign."

Broader Context

This conflict highlights significant challenges facing Syria's transitional government as it attempts to unify the nation following al-Assad's departure. The failure to integrate the SDF into national security structures represents one of the most pressing governance issues for the new administration. The United States, which supports the SDF as its primary local ally against terrorist organizations in Syria, has attempted mediation but recent discussions have concluded without concrete outcomes.

Photo: Financial Times


More News

Iran’s Leaderless War Machine: The IRGC’s Autonomous Cells and the Escalation Nobody Controls

In the fog of a war that has already claimed Iran’s supreme leader and its top military brass, a new and perhaps more dangerous threat is emerging from the rubble of Tehran’s shattered command structure: a Revolutionary Guard Corps that, by design, no longer needs orders from above. Sources with direct knowledge of the situation confirm that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) continues to prosecute strikes across the region not under the direction of the new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, but according to pre-programmed autonomous protocols embedded deep within its decentralized “mosaic defense” architecture. The result is a war machine that has become, in the most literal sense, self-propelling — and increasingly difficult for anyone to stop. A New Supreme Leader With Limited Command Mojtaba Khamenei was formally elected Supreme Leader on 8 March 2026, succeeding his father Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in the opening wave of the US-Israeli “Operation Epic Fury...

2026 US/Israel–Iran War Risk: Why the Chance of Escalation Is Meaningfully Elevated

As 2025 closes, the US/Israel–Iran confrontation is no longer a low-grade shadow struggle managed mainly through diplomacy and proxy conflicts ; it is an openly articulated deterrence contest in which leaders have publicly tied credibility to “red lines” and rapid retaliation. President Trump has stated that if Iran rebuilds its nuclear capabilities or continues rebuilding missile capacity , the response could be immediate and more severe—language that reduces room for quiet de-escalation once a new incident occurs.  At the same time, Iran has replied with warnings of harsh consequences for any renewed attacks, reinforcing a mutual-threat environment where misperception and political signaling can substitute for verifiable facts.  Against that backdrop, the key analytical point for 2026 is not whether a “full war” is the default outcome; it is that the probability that a limited clash escalates into a broader, sustained conflict is meaningfully elevated because the stabili...

Iran's Headscarf Rules Quietly Loosen — But No Law Has Changed

Bareheaded women appear openly in Tehran cafés and streets, yet activists warn the shift is fragile and the law remains on the books. Images have been circulating on social media of something that would have been almost unimaginable in Iran just a few years ago: women sipping coffee in Tehran cafés, strolling busy city streets, and sitting in restaurants — all without a headscarf. The scenes have ignited global attention and renewed debate over whether the Islamic Republic is quietly retreating from one of its most defining ideological pillars. For decades, wearing the hijab in public has been mandatory for all women in Iran — a rule enshrined in the Islamic Penal Code since 1983 and treated as a cornerstone of the clerical state established after the 1979 revolution. Violations could result in fines, arrest, or worse. Yet in recent weeks and months, enforcement appears to have noticeably slackened, at least in major urban centres. A Visible Shift on the Streets Reporters and residents...