Skip to main content

Five Israeli Power Plants Are Potential Targets of Iran’s Retaliatory Attack

Iranian military circles have identified five major Israeli power stations that together produce more than half of Israel’s electricity as prime targets for any large-scale retaliatory strike, Tasnim has learned.

The shortlist emerged from internal analyses conducted after the October 2025 Israeli air strikes that severely damaged electricity infrastructure in Tehran’s Shohada Square district. Sources familiar with the planning say the five plants were selected because even limited, precisely calibrated attacks on them would cause cascading failures across Israel’s national grid.

The facilities named are:

1. Orot Rabin (2,590 MW) – Israel’s largest thermal plant, located on the Mediterranean coast near Hadera.  

2. Rutenberg (2,250 MW) – coastal plant south of Ashkelon.  

3. Hagit (1,371 MW) – combined-cycle station near Yokneam in northern Israel.  

4. Eshkol (912 MW) – hybrid plant north of Ashdod.  

5. Haruvit (Tzafit) (900 MW) – privately owned station near Kiryat Malakhi, operational since 2015.

Combined, these five sites account for over 50% of Israel’s total electricity generation. A senior source close to the planning process told Tasnim that “even a temporary shutdown of two or three of these plants would plunge large parts of Israel into prolonged blackouts, regardless of redundant systems.”

While no final decision has been taken and all options remain under review, the sources emphasized that any Iranian response would be calculated to maximize strategic impact while remaining within Tehran’s declared policy of proportionate retaliation. Technical, economic and international repercussions continue to be weighed at the highest levels.

More News

Iran’s Leaderless War Machine: The IRGC’s Autonomous Cells and the Escalation Nobody Controls

In the fog of a war that has already claimed Iran’s supreme leader and its top military brass, a new and perhaps more dangerous threat is emerging from the rubble of Tehran’s shattered command structure: a Revolutionary Guard Corps that, by design, no longer needs orders from above. Sources with direct knowledge of the situation confirm that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) continues to prosecute strikes across the region not under the direction of the new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, but according to pre-programmed autonomous protocols embedded deep within its decentralized “mosaic defense” architecture. The result is a war machine that has become, in the most literal sense, self-propelling — and increasingly difficult for anyone to stop. A New Supreme Leader With Limited Command Mojtaba Khamenei was formally elected Supreme Leader on 8 March 2026, succeeding his father Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in the opening wave of the US-Israeli “Operation Epic Fury...

2026 US/Israel–Iran War Risk: Why the Chance of Escalation Is Meaningfully Elevated

As 2025 closes, the US/Israel–Iran confrontation is no longer a low-grade shadow struggle managed mainly through diplomacy and proxy conflicts ; it is an openly articulated deterrence contest in which leaders have publicly tied credibility to “red lines” and rapid retaliation. President Trump has stated that if Iran rebuilds its nuclear capabilities or continues rebuilding missile capacity , the response could be immediate and more severe—language that reduces room for quiet de-escalation once a new incident occurs.  At the same time, Iran has replied with warnings of harsh consequences for any renewed attacks, reinforcing a mutual-threat environment where misperception and political signaling can substitute for verifiable facts.  Against that backdrop, the key analytical point for 2026 is not whether a “full war” is the default outcome; it is that the probability that a limited clash escalates into a broader, sustained conflict is meaningfully elevated because the stabili...

Iran's Headscarf Rules Quietly Loosen — But No Law Has Changed

Bareheaded women appear openly in Tehran cafés and streets, yet activists warn the shift is fragile and the law remains on the books. Images have been circulating on social media of something that would have been almost unimaginable in Iran just a few years ago: women sipping coffee in Tehran cafés, strolling busy city streets, and sitting in restaurants — all without a headscarf. The scenes have ignited global attention and renewed debate over whether the Islamic Republic is quietly retreating from one of its most defining ideological pillars. For decades, wearing the hijab in public has been mandatory for all women in Iran — a rule enshrined in the Islamic Penal Code since 1983 and treated as a cornerstone of the clerical state established after the 1979 revolution. Violations could result in fines, arrest, or worse. Yet in recent weeks and months, enforcement appears to have noticeably slackened, at least in major urban centres. A Visible Shift on the Streets Reporters and residents...