Analysts Decipher Pattern Behind President's Military Actions as Quest for Historical Legacy
Amid the confusion surrounding President Donald Trump's simultaneous military operations in Iran, Venezuela, and the tariff war reshaping global trade, a clearer picture is emerging of what Foreign Policy columnist Michael Hirsh describes as the "Trump Doctrine"—a systematic effort to discard the post-war international order and replace it with one bearing his name.
"The Trump vision is about discarding what he sees as a weak, failing world order and turning himself into the author of a new one that will always have his name on it," biographer Gwenda Blair told Foreign Policy, where Hirsh serves as a columnist. This interpretation sheds light on what has appeared to be chaotic decision-making but actually reflects a career-long pattern of "creative destruction" aimed at securing lasting recognition.
The doctrine's roots trace back to a pivotal 1964 moment at the Verrazano-Narrows Bridge opening in New York, when an 18-year-old Trump witnessed engineer Othmar Ammann ignored during the ceremony. "I realized then and there that if you let people treat you how they want, you'll be made a fool," Trump later recounted to the New York Times, as cited by Hirsh in his Foreign Policy analysis. This epiphany established the principle that would govern his entire career: ensuring his name is "prominently stamped on everything he built."
From New York skyscrapers bearing golden "Trump" letters to his rebranding of Washington D.C.—including the partially demolished White House and the renamed Donald J. Trump and John F. Kennedy Memorial Center—the president has treated the presidency as an extension of his real estate empire. Now, Hirsh argues in Foreign Policy, Trump is attempting "to create a kind of Trump World—a global legacy that will far surpass that of his predecessors."
The military operations against Iran and Venezuela fit this pattern. Despite campaign promises to avoid foreign wars, Trump's actions reflect what Blair characterizes as a worldview where "a world order that he's in charge of—that to him is the definition of peace." The administration's shifting justifications—alternating between nuclear weapons, ballistic missiles, and regime change—obscure a deeper objective: replacing recalcitrant regimes with pliable successors personally vetted by Trump himself.
"I have to be involved in the appointment," Trump told Axios regarding Iran's leadership, a stance that Hirsh notes extends to Venezuela, where the president has designated Nicolás Maduro's vice president Delcy Rodríguez as successor. This insistence on personal control mirrors his real estate history, where the New York Times once observed his desire "to be a builder like the hero of Ayn Rand's novel, so large that the skyline is his profile."
Yet Foreign Policy analyst Hirsh cautions that Trump's history includes serious overreaching that drove his companies to six bankruptcies. His current global ambitions face similar risks: oil prices have spiked, Iran has named Mojtaba Khamenei as supreme leader in open defiance of Trump's rejection, and the absence of exit strategies suggests the same "narrow escapes" that characterized his business career.
As Hirsh concludes in his Foreign Policy assessment, Trump has "not met such a comeuppance yet"—the historical reckoning that humbled Johnson, Carter, and Bush—but his fixation on military power and personal branding may yet deliver one. Whether his "Trump World" becomes a lasting monument or another bankruptcy remains the critical question confronting American foreign policy.
Photo: The source