Skip to main content

İmamoğlu Claims Torture During Detention, Describes Five Days Without Food or Water


Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu told a Turkish court on April 28, 2026 that he and fellow detainees were subjected to torture following their arrest on March 19, 2025 — and that the abuse is "still ongoing." The statements were entered into the official court record during a hearing in the ongoing "Ekrem İmamoğlu Criminal Organization" trial held in Silivri, as reported by Murat Yetkin in the YetkinReport.

Speaking before the court, İmamoğlu — the elected mayor of Istanbul, a city of 15.5 million registered voters, and the Republican People's Party's (CHP) presidential candidate — described the five-day period between March 19 and March 23 as extraordinarily difficult. "We went through a very troubled five days," he said. "Five days hungry and thirsty. May God spare anyone from such torment, such torture. This torture has become routine and is still being carried out."

İmamoğlu further alleged that a prosecutor named Cahit Cihat Sarı verbally abused and insulted him and other defendants in the basement of the Çağlayan Courthouse. He noted that Sarı has since been promoted to Director General of Personnel Affairs at the Ministry of Justice — a detail he described as a reward for the prosecutor's conduct.

The hearing also featured testimony from cooperating contractor Âdem Soytekin, who stated that an unnamed Ankara politician had contacted Prosecutor Sarı on his behalf, and that the two later had a falling out. Soytekin declined to name the politician, and the presiding judge did not press him to do so.

According to Yetkin's reporting, İmamoğlu's formal on-record account of mistreatment carries significant legal weight under the European Convention on Human Rights — a treaty Turkey has signed — which affords prominent protections against torture and ill-treatment. The court proceedings continue.



More News

Iran’s Leaderless War Machine: The IRGC’s Autonomous Cells and the Escalation Nobody Controls

In the fog of a war that has already claimed Iran’s supreme leader and its top military brass, a new and perhaps more dangerous threat is emerging from the rubble of Tehran’s shattered command structure: a Revolutionary Guard Corps that, by design, no longer needs orders from above. Sources with direct knowledge of the situation confirm that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) continues to prosecute strikes across the region not under the direction of the new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, but according to pre-programmed autonomous protocols embedded deep within its decentralized “mosaic defense” architecture. The result is a war machine that has become, in the most literal sense, self-propelling — and increasingly difficult for anyone to stop. A New Supreme Leader With Limited Command Mojtaba Khamenei was formally elected Supreme Leader on 8 March 2026, succeeding his father Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in the opening wave of the US-Israeli “Operation Epic Fury...

2026 US/Israel–Iran War Risk: Why the Chance of Escalation Is Meaningfully Elevated

As 2025 closes, the US/Israel–Iran confrontation is no longer a low-grade shadow struggle managed mainly through diplomacy and proxy conflicts ; it is an openly articulated deterrence contest in which leaders have publicly tied credibility to “red lines” and rapid retaliation. President Trump has stated that if Iran rebuilds its nuclear capabilities or continues rebuilding missile capacity , the response could be immediate and more severe—language that reduces room for quiet de-escalation once a new incident occurs.  At the same time, Iran has replied with warnings of harsh consequences for any renewed attacks, reinforcing a mutual-threat environment where misperception and political signaling can substitute for verifiable facts.  Against that backdrop, the key analytical point for 2026 is not whether a “full war” is the default outcome; it is that the probability that a limited clash escalates into a broader, sustained conflict is meaningfully elevated because the stabili...

Iran's Headscarf Rules Quietly Loosen — But No Law Has Changed

Bareheaded women appear openly in Tehran cafés and streets, yet activists warn the shift is fragile and the law remains on the books. Images have been circulating on social media of something that would have been almost unimaginable in Iran just a few years ago: women sipping coffee in Tehran cafés, strolling busy city streets, and sitting in restaurants — all without a headscarf. The scenes have ignited global attention and renewed debate over whether the Islamic Republic is quietly retreating from one of its most defining ideological pillars. For decades, wearing the hijab in public has been mandatory for all women in Iran — a rule enshrined in the Islamic Penal Code since 1983 and treated as a cornerstone of the clerical state established after the 1979 revolution. Violations could result in fines, arrest, or worse. Yet in recent weeks and months, enforcement appears to have noticeably slackened, at least in major urban centres. A Visible Shift on the Streets Reporters and residents...