Skip to main content

Iran Collects First Hormuz Tolls as Economic Pressure Mounts Amid Fragile Ceasefire


Iran has confirmed collecting the first transit tolls from vessels passing through the Strait of Hormuz, a move that signals Tehran's determination to leverage its control over one of the world's most critical maritime chokepoints even as a fragile ceasefire with the United States holds. The development comes amid mounting economic devastation inside Iran and deepening uncertainty over the future of US-Iran negotiations.

Hamidreza Haji-Babai, a member of the Iranian parliament, confirmed that the Islamic Republic had collected fees from some ships transiting the strait, stating that "the first revenue from Hormuz transit tolls has been deposited into the Central Bank's account", according to the BBC News Persian. The Iranian parliament's National Security and Foreign Policy Commission had previously passed legislation titled "Enforcement of the Islamic Republic's Sovereign Rights in the Strait of Hormuz," which authorised the collection of fees covering security, navigation, and environmental costs.

The toll collection places Tehran and Washington in direct confrontation over control of the waterway. President Donald Trump had threatened any country paying what he called "illegal tolls" to Iran to gain passage through the strait. Both Iran and the United States have claimed authority over the passage. Trump extended a temporary ceasefire two days ago at the request of Pakistani officials, giving Tehran time to present a final proposal — while simultaneously maintaining the naval blockade of Iran's southern ports and the Strait of Hormuz.

The closure of the strait has had a severe impact on global energy markets. According to the New York Times, daily ship traffic through Hormuz collapsed from approximately 130 vessels before the conflict began to just eight — and on one day near the end of the eighth week of fighting, only a single vessel transited the strait. Under normal conditions, roughly one-fifth of the world's oil supply and a significant portion of its natural gas passes through Hormuz. The International Energy Agency has reported a roughly 10 percent drop in global oil supply as a result. Shipping analysts at Windward noted that after reports of an attack on one vessel, at least 33 ships abandoned their transit attempts.

The economic toll inside Iran is equally severe. According to NetBlocks, an independent internet monitoring organisation, Iran's nationwide internet blackout has now entered its 55th consecutive day, with connectivity flatlined at approximately 2 percent of pre-conflict levels after 1,296 hours of disruption, reported the Iran International. The blackout, imposed when US and Israeli strikes began in late February 2026, has paralysed online commerce, payment systems, and digital-dependent businesses. Private-sector sources cited by the Telegram channel Emdad estimated the real cost — including indirect war damage — could reach $70 to $80 million per day, with cumulative losses approaching $3 to $4 billion. Iran's Communications Minister had previously stated that each day of internet disruption caused approximately 5,000 billion tomans in direct damage.

Reports have also emerged that government officials, state-media figures, and people connected to the regime have been granted access to international internet through so-called "white SIM cards" — an inequity that has fuelled public anger. A senior parliamentary official confirmed that all decisions on internet access levels rest with the Supreme National Security Council.

Inside Iran's fractured political establishment, divisions over the ceasefire and negotiations are deepening. Ali Khezrian, a member of the parliamentary National Security Commission, said that Mojtaba Khamenei — the new Supreme Leader following the death of Ali Khamenei on the first day of the war — is "strongly opposed" to any extension of negotiations with Washington under the current conditions, according to the BBC News Persian. Khamenei has not appeared in video or audio since his father's death; only written messages attributed to him have been published in Iranian media. Tehran's hardline newspapers characterised Trump's ceasefire extension as a "retreat," while the semi-official Qods newspaper called American diplomacy under current conditions — with Iran under a naval blockade — "meaningless diplomacy."

The humanitarian consequences of the conflict extend well beyond Iran's borders. Alexander De Croo, head of the UN Development Programme, told BBC Persian that even if the US-Israel war with Iran ended tomorrow, at least 32 million people worldwide would be pushed back into poverty as a result of the disruption.

Pahlavi: "Support Transitional Government"

According to the Iran International, the exiled Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi, speaking at a press conference in Berlin, urged the international community to raise human rights and internet access as core issues in any nuclear negotiations with the Islamic Republic. He called on European governments to expel Iranian ambassadors and support a transitional government, warning that figures like Mohammad-Bagher Qalibaf and Abbas Araghchi were not pragmatists but "a different face of the same killing machine" . Pahlavi argued that talks with the Islamic Republic would not lead to a stable outcome and that the regime would use any agreement to rebuild its strength.

More News

Iran’s Leaderless War Machine: The IRGC’s Autonomous Cells and the Escalation Nobody Controls

In the fog of a war that has already claimed Iran’s supreme leader and its top military brass, a new and perhaps more dangerous threat is emerging from the rubble of Tehran’s shattered command structure: a Revolutionary Guard Corps that, by design, no longer needs orders from above. Sources with direct knowledge of the situation confirm that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) continues to prosecute strikes across the region not under the direction of the new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, but according to pre-programmed autonomous protocols embedded deep within its decentralized “mosaic defense” architecture. The result is a war machine that has become, in the most literal sense, self-propelling — and increasingly difficult for anyone to stop. A New Supreme Leader With Limited Command Mojtaba Khamenei was formally elected Supreme Leader on 8 March 2026, succeeding his father Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in the opening wave of the US-Israeli “Operation Epic Fury...

2026 US/Israel–Iran War Risk: Why the Chance of Escalation Is Meaningfully Elevated

As 2025 closes, the US/Israel–Iran confrontation is no longer a low-grade shadow struggle managed mainly through diplomacy and proxy conflicts ; it is an openly articulated deterrence contest in which leaders have publicly tied credibility to “red lines” and rapid retaliation. President Trump has stated that if Iran rebuilds its nuclear capabilities or continues rebuilding missile capacity , the response could be immediate and more severe—language that reduces room for quiet de-escalation once a new incident occurs.  At the same time, Iran has replied with warnings of harsh consequences for any renewed attacks, reinforcing a mutual-threat environment where misperception and political signaling can substitute for verifiable facts.  Against that backdrop, the key analytical point for 2026 is not whether a “full war” is the default outcome; it is that the probability that a limited clash escalates into a broader, sustained conflict is meaningfully elevated because the stabili...

Iran's Headscarf Rules Quietly Loosen — But No Law Has Changed

Bareheaded women appear openly in Tehran cafés and streets, yet activists warn the shift is fragile and the law remains on the books. Images have been circulating on social media of something that would have been almost unimaginable in Iran just a few years ago: women sipping coffee in Tehran cafés, strolling busy city streets, and sitting in restaurants — all without a headscarf. The scenes have ignited global attention and renewed debate over whether the Islamic Republic is quietly retreating from one of its most defining ideological pillars. For decades, wearing the hijab in public has been mandatory for all women in Iran — a rule enshrined in the Islamic Penal Code since 1983 and treated as a cornerstone of the clerical state established after the 1979 revolution. Violations could result in fines, arrest, or worse. Yet in recent weeks and months, enforcement appears to have noticeably slackened, at least in major urban centres. A Visible Shift on the Streets Reporters and residents...