Skip to main content

Iranian Press: Tehran Threatens Regional Port Security if Its Own Ports Are Targeted


Amid escalating tensions over the Strait of Hormuz, Tehran issues sweeping maritime warning

 

Iran's military has issued a stark warning that any attack on Iranian ports would render all ports across the Persian Gulf and the Sea of Oman insecure, according to state-affiliated Press TV, the Islamic Republic's English-language state broadcaster.

Lieutenant Colonel Ebrahim Zolfaqari, spokesperson for the Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, declared on Monday that maritime security in the region is a collective matter — one that must apply to all parties or to none. Speaking in a statement cited by state-affiliated Press TV, Zolfaqari said the Iranian Armed Forces regard the defense of national rights, including full sovereignty over territorial waters, as a lawful and natural obligation.

The senior military official also announced that Iran intends to establish a permanent mechanism to control the Strait of Hormuz even after the current crisis is resolved — a significant escalation in Tehran's long-term strategic posture. He further described what he called US restrictions on maritime transit in international waters as illegal and tantamount to piracy.

"Enemy-affiliated vessels do not and will not have the right to pass through the Strait of Hormuz," Zolfaqari stated, as quoted by state-affiliated Press TV, adding that other vessels may transit the strait in compliance with regulations set by the Iranian Armed Forces.

The warning came in direct response to a statement by US President Donald Trump, who announced on Sunday that the US Navy would enforce a naval blockade on the Strait of Hormuz, with the measure set to take effect Monday at 14:00 GMT. Iran's Navy commander, as reported by state-affiliated Press TV, dismissed Trump's announcement as "very ridiculous and laughable," stating that Iranian forces are closely monitoring every movement of the US fleet in the region.

According to state-affiliated Press TV, Iran has maintained restrictions on Hormuz passage since the start of the US-Israeli military campaign on February 28, allowing vessels from friendly nations to pass while barring ships linked to what Tehran designates as aggressor states and their supporters. The Iranian parliament has also advanced draft legislation to impose transit fees — payable in national currency — and to formally ban US and Israeli vessels from the strait.

More News

Iran’s Leaderless War Machine: The IRGC’s Autonomous Cells and the Escalation Nobody Controls

In the fog of a war that has already claimed Iran’s supreme leader and its top military brass, a new and perhaps more dangerous threat is emerging from the rubble of Tehran’s shattered command structure: a Revolutionary Guard Corps that, by design, no longer needs orders from above. Sources with direct knowledge of the situation confirm that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) continues to prosecute strikes across the region not under the direction of the new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, but according to pre-programmed autonomous protocols embedded deep within its decentralized “mosaic defense” architecture. The result is a war machine that has become, in the most literal sense, self-propelling — and increasingly difficult for anyone to stop. A New Supreme Leader With Limited Command Mojtaba Khamenei was formally elected Supreme Leader on 8 March 2026, succeeding his father Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in the opening wave of the US-Israeli “Operation Epic Fury...

2026 US/Israel–Iran War Risk: Why the Chance of Escalation Is Meaningfully Elevated

As 2025 closes, the US/Israel–Iran confrontation is no longer a low-grade shadow struggle managed mainly through diplomacy and proxy conflicts ; it is an openly articulated deterrence contest in which leaders have publicly tied credibility to “red lines” and rapid retaliation. President Trump has stated that if Iran rebuilds its nuclear capabilities or continues rebuilding missile capacity , the response could be immediate and more severe—language that reduces room for quiet de-escalation once a new incident occurs.  At the same time, Iran has replied with warnings of harsh consequences for any renewed attacks, reinforcing a mutual-threat environment where misperception and political signaling can substitute for verifiable facts.  Against that backdrop, the key analytical point for 2026 is not whether a “full war” is the default outcome; it is that the probability that a limited clash escalates into a broader, sustained conflict is meaningfully elevated because the stabili...

Iran's Headscarf Rules Quietly Loosen — But No Law Has Changed

Bareheaded women appear openly in Tehran cafés and streets, yet activists warn the shift is fragile and the law remains on the books. Images have been circulating on social media of something that would have been almost unimaginable in Iran just a few years ago: women sipping coffee in Tehran cafés, strolling busy city streets, and sitting in restaurants — all without a headscarf. The scenes have ignited global attention and renewed debate over whether the Islamic Republic is quietly retreating from one of its most defining ideological pillars. For decades, wearing the hijab in public has been mandatory for all women in Iran — a rule enshrined in the Islamic Penal Code since 1983 and treated as a cornerstone of the clerical state established after the 1979 revolution. Violations could result in fines, arrest, or worse. Yet in recent weeks and months, enforcement appears to have noticeably slackened, at least in major urban centres. A Visible Shift on the Streets Reporters and residents...