Skip to main content

From Execution Calls to Peace Talks: Bahçeli’s Öcalan Proposal Stuns Ankara

Turkey’s political landscape has been shaken by an unexpected proposal from Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) leader Devlet Bahçeli, who suggested that jailed PKK leader Abdullah Öcalan be granted the title of “Peace Process and Political Coordination Coordinator” as part of efforts toward a “terror-free Turkey”.

Speaking at his party’s parliamentary group meeting on May 5, Bahçeli, who years ago demanded the corporal punishment for Öcalan, endorsed demands long voiced by the pro-Kurdish DEM Party for granting Öcalan a formal status in a renewed peace process. The proposal marks a stark reversal for Bahçeli, who only a few years ago called for the reinstatement of the death penalty against Öcalan.

Political Alignment Emerges

The proposal was quickly welcomed by DEM Party leadership. Co-chair Tuncer Bakırhan announced their full support and called for the immediate establishment of a parliamentary “Peace Monitoring and Oversight Council,” suggesting legislation could pass within a week.

Main opposition Republican People’s Party (CHP) leader Özgür Özel also signaled backing for a broader initiative combining PKK disarmament with democratic reforms, indicating rare cross-party convergence.

This alignment has effectively revived what is now openly being called a “peace process,” replacing the earlier “terror-free Turkey” framing that had appeared stalled just weeks earlier.

According to Murat Yetkin, the timing of Bahçeli’s remarks closely coincided with a statement from PKK leadership, released via Firat News Agency (ANF), which emphasized that granting Öcalan official status was an “urgent” condition for progress. Notably, the statement was issued under the name “Apoist Movement,” an apparent signal of a transition away from the PKK’s traditional organizational identity.

Yetkin suggests that such simultaneity points to behind-the-scenes coordination, potentially involving Turkey’s National Intelligence Organization (MİT) and political actors, including DEM representatives.

Behind-the-Scenes Diplomacy

The developments follow a May 1 meeting between President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and Bahçeli, after which reports emerged that MİT had briefed ruling AK Party officials on a “verification mechanism” for PKK disarmament. 

While details remain unclear, the sequence of events indicates intensified backchannel diplomacy in the lead-up to May 5.

Recent polling shows cautious public support for the process at 55–58 percent, though reactions to elevating Öcalan to a formal coordinating role remain uncertain. The ruling AK Party is expected to play a निर्णত role in shaping both policy and public perception, particularly among nationalist voters.

More News

Iran’s Leaderless War Machine: The IRGC’s Autonomous Cells and the Escalation Nobody Controls

In the fog of a war that has already claimed Iran’s supreme leader and its top military brass, a new and perhaps more dangerous threat is emerging from the rubble of Tehran’s shattered command structure: a Revolutionary Guard Corps that, by design, no longer needs orders from above. Sources with direct knowledge of the situation confirm that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) continues to prosecute strikes across the region not under the direction of the new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, but according to pre-programmed autonomous protocols embedded deep within its decentralized “mosaic defense” architecture. The result is a war machine that has become, in the most literal sense, self-propelling — and increasingly difficult for anyone to stop. A New Supreme Leader With Limited Command Mojtaba Khamenei was formally elected Supreme Leader on 8 March 2026, succeeding his father Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in the opening wave of the US-Israeli “Operation Epic Fury...

2026 US/Israel–Iran War Risk: Why the Chance of Escalation Is Meaningfully Elevated

As 2025 closes, the US/Israel–Iran confrontation is no longer a low-grade shadow struggle managed mainly through diplomacy and proxy conflicts ; it is an openly articulated deterrence contest in which leaders have publicly tied credibility to “red lines” and rapid retaliation. President Trump has stated that if Iran rebuilds its nuclear capabilities or continues rebuilding missile capacity , the response could be immediate and more severe—language that reduces room for quiet de-escalation once a new incident occurs.  At the same time, Iran has replied with warnings of harsh consequences for any renewed attacks, reinforcing a mutual-threat environment where misperception and political signaling can substitute for verifiable facts.  Against that backdrop, the key analytical point for 2026 is not whether a “full war” is the default outcome; it is that the probability that a limited clash escalates into a broader, sustained conflict is meaningfully elevated because the stabili...

Iran's Headscarf Rules Quietly Loosen — But No Law Has Changed

Bareheaded women appear openly in Tehran cafés and streets, yet activists warn the shift is fragile and the law remains on the books. Images have been circulating on social media of something that would have been almost unimaginable in Iran just a few years ago: women sipping coffee in Tehran cafés, strolling busy city streets, and sitting in restaurants — all without a headscarf. The scenes have ignited global attention and renewed debate over whether the Islamic Republic is quietly retreating from one of its most defining ideological pillars. For decades, wearing the hijab in public has been mandatory for all women in Iran — a rule enshrined in the Islamic Penal Code since 1983 and treated as a cornerstone of the clerical state established after the 1979 revolution. Violations could result in fines, arrest, or worse. Yet in recent weeks and months, enforcement appears to have noticeably slackened, at least in major urban centres. A Visible Shift on the Streets Reporters and residents...