Skip to main content

Haaretz: Trump's Iran Deterrence in Tatters as Gulf War Stalls

U.S. President Donald Trump has effectively squandered his deterrence against Iran through a cycle of unfulfilled threats and repeated concession offers, leaving Washington with few good options as the Gulf conflict enters a dangerous new phase, according to Amos Harel, military affairs analyst at Haaretz.

Iran on Sunday rejected the latest American diplomatic proposal to end the war, despite sustaining severe economic damage and facing a vast military imbalance with the United States. Harel writes that Tehran's continued defiance stems directly from Trump's pattern of issuing bold warnings only to return to the negotiating table empty-handed — a pattern that has convinced Iranian leaders they hold the strategic upper hand.

The standoff now centers on the Strait of Hormuz, which Iran has effectively closed to international shipping. Tehran is demanding an end to hostilities, guaranteed maritime passage for its own interests, the lifting of international sanctions, and a binding commitment that neither the U.S. nor Israel will strike Iran again — before it will even discuss restraints on its nuclear program. According to U.S. media reports cited by Harel, Iran has also shown far less flexibility on the nuclear file than previously suggested, offering only to remove a portion of its enriched uranium stockpile while refusing to dismantle nuclear infrastructure.

Trump faces a compounding timeline. He is scheduled to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping this week, and the United States is set to host the FIFA World Cup in one month — both events the president views as priorities that limit his appetite for military escalation.

The strategic damage is being catalogued beyond Israeli media. In a widely read piece in The Atlantic, neoconservative historian Robert Kagan described the situation as "a checkmate" for the United States — "a setback so decisive that the strategic loss could be neither repaired nor ignored." Kagan argues that 37 days of intensive American and Israeli airstrikes failed to collapse the Iranian regime or extract a single meaningful concession, and that Iran's grip on Hormuz has transformed it into a decisive regional and global power while weakening U.S. credibility.

The war's ripple effects are also being felt in Lebanon. IDF ground forces in southern Lebanon remain in defensive positions, suffering daily drone attacks from Hezbollah. A reservist was killed by a drone on Sunday; three more soldiers were wounded on Monday. Harel notes that Israel's retaliatory airstrikes have been geographically limited, reportedly due to American pressure, and that fiber-optic drone technology used by Hezbollah has yet to be countered effectively.

Meanwhile, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu — facing elections — has been focused on shaping the political narrative rather than military strategy. In an interview with CBS' 60 Minutes on Sunday, Netanyahu sidestepped questions about his responsibility for failures preceding the October 7 massacre, saying only, "Everybody bears some responsibility," while deflecting to his post-October 7 record. Harel writes that this question is set to dominate the coming election campaign. 

More News

Iran’s Leaderless War Machine: The IRGC’s Autonomous Cells and the Escalation Nobody Controls

In the fog of a war that has already claimed Iran’s supreme leader and its top military brass, a new and perhaps more dangerous threat is emerging from the rubble of Tehran’s shattered command structure: a Revolutionary Guard Corps that, by design, no longer needs orders from above. Sources with direct knowledge of the situation confirm that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) continues to prosecute strikes across the region not under the direction of the new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, but according to pre-programmed autonomous protocols embedded deep within its decentralized “mosaic defense” architecture. The result is a war machine that has become, in the most literal sense, self-propelling — and increasingly difficult for anyone to stop. A New Supreme Leader With Limited Command Mojtaba Khamenei was formally elected Supreme Leader on 8 March 2026, succeeding his father Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in the opening wave of the US-Israeli “Operation Epic Fury...

2026 US/Israel–Iran War Risk: Why the Chance of Escalation Is Meaningfully Elevated

As 2025 closes, the US/Israel–Iran confrontation is no longer a low-grade shadow struggle managed mainly through diplomacy and proxy conflicts ; it is an openly articulated deterrence contest in which leaders have publicly tied credibility to “red lines” and rapid retaliation. President Trump has stated that if Iran rebuilds its nuclear capabilities or continues rebuilding missile capacity , the response could be immediate and more severe—language that reduces room for quiet de-escalation once a new incident occurs.  At the same time, Iran has replied with warnings of harsh consequences for any renewed attacks, reinforcing a mutual-threat environment where misperception and political signaling can substitute for verifiable facts.  Against that backdrop, the key analytical point for 2026 is not whether a “full war” is the default outcome; it is that the probability that a limited clash escalates into a broader, sustained conflict is meaningfully elevated because the stabili...

Iran's Headscarf Rules Quietly Loosen — But No Law Has Changed

Bareheaded women appear openly in Tehran cafés and streets, yet activists warn the shift is fragile and the law remains on the books. Images have been circulating on social media of something that would have been almost unimaginable in Iran just a few years ago: women sipping coffee in Tehran cafés, strolling busy city streets, and sitting in restaurants — all without a headscarf. The scenes have ignited global attention and renewed debate over whether the Islamic Republic is quietly retreating from one of its most defining ideological pillars. For decades, wearing the hijab in public has been mandatory for all women in Iran — a rule enshrined in the Islamic Penal Code since 1983 and treated as a cornerstone of the clerical state established after the 1979 revolution. Violations could result in fines, arrest, or worse. Yet in recent weeks and months, enforcement appears to have noticeably slackened, at least in major urban centres. A Visible Shift on the Streets Reporters and residents...