Skip to main content

Iran's Headscarf Rules Quietly Loosen — But No Law Has Changed

Bareheaded women appear openly in Tehran cafés and streets, yet activists warn the shift is fragile and the law remains on the books.


Images have been circulating on social media of something that would have been almost unimaginable in Iran just a few years ago: women sipping coffee in Tehran cafés, strolling busy city streets, and sitting in restaurants — all without a headscarf. The scenes have ignited global attention and renewed debate over whether the Islamic Republic is quietly retreating from one of its most defining ideological pillars.

For decades, wearing the hijab in public has been mandatory for all women in Iran — a rule enshrined in the Islamic Penal Code since 1983 and treated as a cornerstone of the clerical state established after the 1979 revolution. Violations could result in fines, arrest, or worse. Yet in recent weeks and months, enforcement appears to have noticeably slackened, at least in major urban centres.

A Visible Shift on the Streets

Reporters and residents describe a transformed streetscape in parts of Tehran. Women are increasingly seen without headscarves in public spaces, often posting videos online in acts of civil disobedience. The once-ubiquitous manteau coat has nearly vanished in some neighbourhoods, replaced by long blouses and trousers. Crop tops and open shirts have become increasingly visible among young women — a quiet but unmistakable shift in daily life.

"Just three years ago, this would have felt like a dream," said Zahra, 57, a housewife from Isfahan. "My youth has passed and I didn't get to have this experience; now I don't wear it anymore, but I wish I could have experienced these days when I was young."

The change gained momentum from the 2022–2023 nationwide protests sparked by the death of Mahsa Amini, a 22-year-old Kurdish woman who died in custody after being detained by the Morality Police for allegedly violating dress codes. The protests, known as the Women, Life, Freedom movement, proved to be a turning point. Though violently suppressed, they left a lasting mark on public behaviour and official willingness to enforce the veil.

Legal Limbo: A Law Suspended but Not Repealed

The legal picture is deliberately murky. In late 2024, Iran's hardline parliament passed a sweeping new "Chastity and Hijab" bill that would have imposed steep economic penalties — fines, travel bans, and lengthy prison terms — on women who defied the dress code. But in an unprecedented move, the Supreme National Security Council quietly suspended the law, apparently fearing it would ignite fresh unrest.

In October 2025, Mohammadreza Bahonar, a conservative member of Iran's Expediency Discernment Council, made waves when he told reporters that there was essentially "no compulsory hijab law in force." The remark triggered a furious backlash from ultra-hardliners, and Bahonar later retracted it. Iran's judiciary spokesman subsequently confirmed that existing hijab laws — including Article 638 of the Islamic Penal Code — remain on the books and enforceable.

That contradiction captures the current state of affairs: the law has not changed, but the will to enforce it has visibly weakened in many parts of the country.

Activists Warn Against Optimism

Women's rights advocates urge caution about reading too much into the visible changes. Analysts say authorities have slackened off on imposing the mandatory hijab in daily life, but are far from abandoning an ideological pillar of the Islamic Republic, warning a new wave of repression could come at any time.

Arash Azizi, a postdoctoral associate at Yale University, told AFP that "the regime has given up on harshly enforcing mandatory hijab but it has not at all given up on it as a principle yet." He added: "We still see places closed down and even people fined and arrested due to lax hijab. But the regime knows that it will be very difficult to put the genie back in the bottle."

Amnesty International noted this month that "widespread resistance" to the obligatory hijab had "forced authorities to retreat from the violent mass arrests and assaults of previous years" — but stressed that women continue to face harassment, arbitrary arrest, fines, and expulsion from employment and education for resisting.

Enforcement remains uneven. Women can still be summoned by authorities for appearing without a headscarf, and cafés have been shut down for failing to enforce the rule. In Isfahan, one of Iran's more conservative cities, businesses reported their premises being sealed over hijab violations even as the debate raged nationally. The situation in smaller towns and rural areas remains considerably stricter than in Tehran.

A Country at a Crossroads

For many Iranian women, the moment feels historic but precarious. Elnaz, a 32-year-old painter based in Tehran who spoke to AFP, warned against misreading the visible shift: "It is not at all a sign of any change in the government. Because no achievement has been made regarding women's rights. Under the surface, in reality, no real change has taken place in people's freedom."

Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has continued to publicly defend the hijab as a religious and legal duty, and hardline judiciary chief Gholamhossein Mohseni Ejei recently warned that intelligence agencies had been instructed to identify and report "organised currents promoting immorality and non-veiling."

Yet a 2022 survey by the independent research group GAMAAN found that over 70 percent of men and women in Iran opposed mandatory hijab laws — a figure that underscores the widening gap between official policy and public sentiment. Whether that gap becomes a permanent feature of Iranian society, or narrows again under a renewed crackdown, remains one of the defining questions of the Islamic Republic's future.

Artwork: Gemini

 

More News

Iran’s Leaderless War Machine: The IRGC’s Autonomous Cells and the Escalation Nobody Controls

In the fog of a war that has already claimed Iran’s supreme leader and its top military brass, a new and perhaps more dangerous threat is emerging from the rubble of Tehran’s shattered command structure: a Revolutionary Guard Corps that, by design, no longer needs orders from above. Sources with direct knowledge of the situation confirm that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) continues to prosecute strikes across the region not under the direction of the new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, but according to pre-programmed autonomous protocols embedded deep within its decentralized “mosaic defense” architecture. The result is a war machine that has become, in the most literal sense, self-propelling — and increasingly difficult for anyone to stop. A New Supreme Leader With Limited Command Mojtaba Khamenei was formally elected Supreme Leader on 8 March 2026, succeeding his father Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in the opening wave of the US-Israeli “Operation Epic Fury...

2026 US/Israel–Iran War Risk: Why the Chance of Escalation Is Meaningfully Elevated

As 2025 closes, the US/Israel–Iran confrontation is no longer a low-grade shadow struggle managed mainly through diplomacy and proxy conflicts ; it is an openly articulated deterrence contest in which leaders have publicly tied credibility to “red lines” and rapid retaliation. President Trump has stated that if Iran rebuilds its nuclear capabilities or continues rebuilding missile capacity , the response could be immediate and more severe—language that reduces room for quiet de-escalation once a new incident occurs.  At the same time, Iran has replied with warnings of harsh consequences for any renewed attacks, reinforcing a mutual-threat environment where misperception and political signaling can substitute for verifiable facts.  Against that backdrop, the key analytical point for 2026 is not whether a “full war” is the default outcome; it is that the probability that a limited clash escalates into a broader, sustained conflict is meaningfully elevated because the stabili...