Skip to main content

Netanyahu's Circle Blames Trump for Failed Iran Regime Change



Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu views the emerging US-Iran agreement as a disaster and holds President Donald Trump responsible for it, a senior political source told Ben Caspit of Al-Monitor. With the Tehran regime still in power and a possible accord taking shape, members of Netanyahu's circle warn that Israel's longest-serving leader could pay the ultimate political price as elections approach.

The prospect of a deal has fueled speculation that Netanyahu may be forced to step down to avoid losing the upcoming vote and risking prison over his corruption indictment. “This time, the prime minister's hands are tied. He is completely paralyzed and knows that he will not be able to do anything,” one associate told Al-Monitor on condition of anonymity, adding that Netanyahu now longs for the days of Presidents Joe Biden and even Barack Obama. “Now, all he can do is salute Trump.”

Since Trump announced an April 8 ceasefire with Tehran, opponents have rejected Netanyahu's claims that Iran was defeated. Opposition leader Yair Lapid accused him of failing to shape the terms of the agreement, telling reporters in Jerusalem, “The deal is bad for Israel, bad for the region and bad for the citizens of Iran.”

Elections are scheduled for September or October. Although Netanyahu is not known for quitting, the associate said a damaging accord could push him toward a plea bargain to end the corruption trial he has faced since May 2020 — a possibility raised again when President Isaac Herzog invited the prime minister and prosecutors to discuss an agreement on April 28. Trump's pressure on Herzog has so far failed to produce a pardon, and with little time left to advance legislation shielding him from conviction, a plea deal may be Netanyahu's last viable option.

A Missed Chance to Topple Tehran

Netanyahu's inner circle also faults Trump for abandoning what security officials describe as a realistic opportunity to bring down the Iranian regime with the help of the country's Kurdish minority. Fox News reported on March 3 that thousands of armed Kurdish fighters planned to cross from Iraq into Iran under US and Israeli air cover. Days later, Trump said he opposed the move: “They're willing to go in, but I've told them I don't want them to go in. The war is complicated enough as it is.”

A senior Israeli intelligence source told Al-Monitor the plan was “comprehensive and detailed,” insisting it “was not a gimmick.” He said the Kurds were eager to act alongside the Israeli air force and American power, “but Washington hit the brakes at the last minute.” The source attributed the reversal to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan's influence over Trump, lamenting, “Who knows when or if such an opportunity will arise again.” He added that Trump repeatedly blocked other operational initiatives Israel had developed, warning the consequences “could be disastrous and long-term.”

Another security official argued regime change remains achievable: “Eighty percent of the Iranian people aspire to get rid of the regime and live in a freer country. It can still be done with patience and proper conduct.” But he warned that a deal funneling billions of dollars back to Tehran would destroy those prospects.

Hormuz and the Question of Power

The intelligence source also flagged the danger of Iran gaining de facto control over the Strait of Hormuz, calling the waterway a weapon “perhaps even more valuable than nuclear arms.” Israeli officials expect any agreement Trump signs would extend the ceasefire through a memorandum of understanding without fully addressing Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium or its future nuclear capabilities. Adding to the uncertainty, the source questioned who truly governs in Tehran: “The question is whether [Supreme Leader] Mojtaba Khamenei is managing events or being managed by others. At the moment, we do not have a definitive answer.”


More News

Iran’s Leaderless War Machine: The IRGC’s Autonomous Cells and the Escalation Nobody Controls

In the fog of a war that has already claimed Iran’s supreme leader and its top military brass, a new and perhaps more dangerous threat is emerging from the rubble of Tehran’s shattered command structure: a Revolutionary Guard Corps that, by design, no longer needs orders from above. Sources with direct knowledge of the situation confirm that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) continues to prosecute strikes across the region not under the direction of the new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, but according to pre-programmed autonomous protocols embedded deep within its decentralized “mosaic defense” architecture. The result is a war machine that has become, in the most literal sense, self-propelling — and increasingly difficult for anyone to stop. A New Supreme Leader With Limited Command Mojtaba Khamenei was formally elected Supreme Leader on 8 March 2026, succeeding his father Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in the opening wave of the US-Israeli “Operation Epic Fury...

2026 US/Israel–Iran War Risk: Why the Chance of Escalation Is Meaningfully Elevated

As 2025 closes, the US/Israel–Iran confrontation is no longer a low-grade shadow struggle managed mainly through diplomacy and proxy conflicts ; it is an openly articulated deterrence contest in which leaders have publicly tied credibility to “red lines” and rapid retaliation. President Trump has stated that if Iran rebuilds its nuclear capabilities or continues rebuilding missile capacity , the response could be immediate and more severe—language that reduces room for quiet de-escalation once a new incident occurs.  At the same time, Iran has replied with warnings of harsh consequences for any renewed attacks, reinforcing a mutual-threat environment where misperception and political signaling can substitute for verifiable facts.  Against that backdrop, the key analytical point for 2026 is not whether a “full war” is the default outcome; it is that the probability that a limited clash escalates into a broader, sustained conflict is meaningfully elevated because the stabili...

Iran's Headscarf Rules Quietly Loosen — But No Law Has Changed

Bareheaded women appear openly in Tehran cafés and streets, yet activists warn the shift is fragile and the law remains on the books. Images have been circulating on social media of something that would have been almost unimaginable in Iran just a few years ago: women sipping coffee in Tehran cafés, strolling busy city streets, and sitting in restaurants — all without a headscarf. The scenes have ignited global attention and renewed debate over whether the Islamic Republic is quietly retreating from one of its most defining ideological pillars. For decades, wearing the hijab in public has been mandatory for all women in Iran — a rule enshrined in the Islamic Penal Code since 1983 and treated as a cornerstone of the clerical state established after the 1979 revolution. Violations could result in fines, arrest, or worse. Yet in recent weeks and months, enforcement appears to have noticeably slackened, at least in major urban centres. A Visible Shift on the Streets Reporters and residents...