Skip to main content

Signaling Both Capability and Deterrence: Iran Warns It Could Raise Uranium Enrichment to 90%

Iran could enrich uranium to 90% purity if it comes under attack again, a senior Iranian lawmaker said on Tuesday, underscoring how quickly the nuclear issue could return to the center of a renewed confrontation with the United States and Israel.

Ebrahim Rezaei, spokesperson for the Iranian parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, stated that such a step could be considered in parliament if hostilities resume. His remarks came as President Donald Trump reiterated that one of the central aims of launching the war against Iran was to ensure Tehran does not develop a nuclear weapon.

Iran, which maintains that its nuclear program is peaceful, is reportedly holding more than 400 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60%. This is described as a short technical step from the 90% level associated with weapons‑grade material. In a post on X, Rezaei said 90% enrichment could become one of Iran’s options in the event of another attack.

The warning reflects the broader strategic dispute over how the war will conclude and what conditions might prevent a new round of fighting. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said the war will continue as long as Iran retains highly enriched uranium, arguing that both the stockpile and the enrichment facilities must be removed or dismantled.

Taken together, the remarks suggest that Tehran is signaling both capability and deterrence rather than announcing an immediate policy shift. The language appears intended to warn Washington and Israel that any renewed military action could trigger a sharper nuclear escalation.

At the same time, the statement serves a political purpose by raising the cost of further pressure and reinforcing Iran’s leverage at a moment when the ceasefire appears fragile. In that sense, the latest warning reads less like a formal declaration of weaponization and more like carefully calibrated coercive messaging rooted in Iran’s current enrichment posture.

More News

Iran’s Leaderless War Machine: The IRGC’s Autonomous Cells and the Escalation Nobody Controls

In the fog of a war that has already claimed Iran’s supreme leader and its top military brass, a new and perhaps more dangerous threat is emerging from the rubble of Tehran’s shattered command structure: a Revolutionary Guard Corps that, by design, no longer needs orders from above. Sources with direct knowledge of the situation confirm that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) continues to prosecute strikes across the region not under the direction of the new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, but according to pre-programmed autonomous protocols embedded deep within its decentralized “mosaic defense” architecture. The result is a war machine that has become, in the most literal sense, self-propelling — and increasingly difficult for anyone to stop. A New Supreme Leader With Limited Command Mojtaba Khamenei was formally elected Supreme Leader on 8 March 2026, succeeding his father Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in the opening wave of the US-Israeli “Operation Epic Fury...

2026 US/Israel–Iran War Risk: Why the Chance of Escalation Is Meaningfully Elevated

As 2025 closes, the US/Israel–Iran confrontation is no longer a low-grade shadow struggle managed mainly through diplomacy and proxy conflicts ; it is an openly articulated deterrence contest in which leaders have publicly tied credibility to “red lines” and rapid retaliation. President Trump has stated that if Iran rebuilds its nuclear capabilities or continues rebuilding missile capacity , the response could be immediate and more severe—language that reduces room for quiet de-escalation once a new incident occurs.  At the same time, Iran has replied with warnings of harsh consequences for any renewed attacks, reinforcing a mutual-threat environment where misperception and political signaling can substitute for verifiable facts.  Against that backdrop, the key analytical point for 2026 is not whether a “full war” is the default outcome; it is that the probability that a limited clash escalates into a broader, sustained conflict is meaningfully elevated because the stabili...

Iran's Headscarf Rules Quietly Loosen — But No Law Has Changed

Bareheaded women appear openly in Tehran cafés and streets, yet activists warn the shift is fragile and the law remains on the books. Images have been circulating on social media of something that would have been almost unimaginable in Iran just a few years ago: women sipping coffee in Tehran cafés, strolling busy city streets, and sitting in restaurants — all without a headscarf. The scenes have ignited global attention and renewed debate over whether the Islamic Republic is quietly retreating from one of its most defining ideological pillars. For decades, wearing the hijab in public has been mandatory for all women in Iran — a rule enshrined in the Islamic Penal Code since 1983 and treated as a cornerstone of the clerical state established after the 1979 revolution. Violations could result in fines, arrest, or worse. Yet in recent weeks and months, enforcement appears to have noticeably slackened, at least in major urban centres. A Visible Shift on the Streets Reporters and residents...