Skip to main content

Israel Denies US Claim of Southern Lebanon Withdrawal, Report Says



Israel has officially denied a U.S. State Department claim that it withdrew from buffer zones in southern Lebanon, according to a report by The Jerusalem Post published Thursday. Two IDF sources flatly rejected the American assertion, while a senior Lebanese security official told the Post that Beirut was also unaware of any such troop movement.

The U.S. official had argued that Israel had "already taken a concrete step by pulling back from a part of its buffer zone," calling it a "significant demonstration of good faith toward Lebanon’s legitimate government." The official urged the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) to "move in and verifiably clear out terrorist weapons and infrastructure," adding that this model would be repeated across the south to enable the return of displaced families. However, the IDF sources quoted by The Jerusalem Post contradicted this, insisting no pullback has occurred.

The report, written by Yonah Jeremy Bob and Reuters, details that during recent negotiations, Israel offered only a very modest "pilot" withdrawal—potentially from recently taken areas like Tibnin and the Ali Taher Ridge. The concept, per IDF thinking, is to test whether the LAF will effectively dismantle Hezbollah infrastructure in those specific zones before committing to broader redeployments. Some Israeli officials are attempting to differentiate between areas that offer Hezbollah a direct line of sight to fire on Israeli villages and those that do not.

Despite these nuances, both the Lebanese government and Hezbollah—while at odds on most issues—are jointly pushing for a faster and wider withdrawal, The Jerusalem Post reported. Multiple potential retreat lines exist. Until May 26, Israel had not crossed the Litani River or Wadi Saluki, and the IDF could revert to that boundary. Alternatively, it could pull back from the current deep advance of over 10 kilometers to one of three village lines, or even to the five outposts held just several hundred meters into Lebanon as of February 2025.

However, given that a previous withdrawal took four months, any future pullback is expected to be gradual, contingent on Hezbollah's ceasefire compliance and the LAF's willingness to confront the group. Crucially, The Jerusalem Post notes that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz have signaled that the IDF may remain in parts of southern Lebanon for "many months or even years" to pressure Hezbollah into disarmament, complicating any imminent U.S.-led diplomatic breakthrough.

More News

Iran’s Leaderless War Machine: The IRGC’s Autonomous Cells and the Escalation Nobody Controls

In the fog of a war that has already claimed Iran’s supreme leader and its top military brass, a new and perhaps more dangerous threat is emerging from the rubble of Tehran’s shattered command structure: a Revolutionary Guard Corps that, by design, no longer needs orders from above. Sources with direct knowledge of the situation confirm that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) continues to prosecute strikes across the region not under the direction of the new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, but according to pre-programmed autonomous protocols embedded deep within its decentralized “mosaic defense” architecture. The result is a war machine that has become, in the most literal sense, self-propelling — and increasingly difficult for anyone to stop. A New Supreme Leader With Limited Command Mojtaba Khamenei was formally elected Supreme Leader on 8 March 2026, succeeding his father Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in the opening wave of the US-Israeli “Operation Epic Fury...

2026 US/Israel–Iran War Risk: Why the Chance of Escalation Is Meaningfully Elevated

As 2025 closes, the US/Israel–Iran confrontation is no longer a low-grade shadow struggle managed mainly through diplomacy and proxy conflicts ; it is an openly articulated deterrence contest in which leaders have publicly tied credibility to “red lines” and rapid retaliation. President Trump has stated that if Iran rebuilds its nuclear capabilities or continues rebuilding missile capacity , the response could be immediate and more severe—language that reduces room for quiet de-escalation once a new incident occurs.  At the same time, Iran has replied with warnings of harsh consequences for any renewed attacks, reinforcing a mutual-threat environment where misperception and political signaling can substitute for verifiable facts.  Against that backdrop, the key analytical point for 2026 is not whether a “full war” is the default outcome; it is that the probability that a limited clash escalates into a broader, sustained conflict is meaningfully elevated because the stabili...

Iran's Headscarf Rules Quietly Loosen — But No Law Has Changed

Bareheaded women appear openly in Tehran cafés and streets, yet activists warn the shift is fragile and the law remains on the books. Images have been circulating on social media of something that would have been almost unimaginable in Iran just a few years ago: women sipping coffee in Tehran cafés, strolling busy city streets, and sitting in restaurants — all without a headscarf. The scenes have ignited global attention and renewed debate over whether the Islamic Republic is quietly retreating from one of its most defining ideological pillars. For decades, wearing the hijab in public has been mandatory for all women in Iran — a rule enshrined in the Islamic Penal Code since 1983 and treated as a cornerstone of the clerical state established after the 1979 revolution. Violations could result in fines, arrest, or worse. Yet in recent weeks and months, enforcement appears to have noticeably slackened, at least in major urban centres. A Visible Shift on the Streets Reporters and residents...