Skip to main content

FT: Greek Shipping Giants Earned Nearly $4 Billion Transporting Russian Oil Under Western Sanctions Regime

 


Greek shipping companies have generated at least $3.8 billion in revenues transporting Russian oil over the past three years, capitalizing on a sanctions framework that permits the trade under strict conditions, according to an analysis by the Financial Times.

The investigation, based on freight cost estimates from Argus Media and tanker movement data from Kpler, found that Dynacom Tankers — founded by Greek shipping billionaire George Prokopiou — led the trade with at least $915 million in revenues, accounting for nearly a quarter of the total among Greek shipowners since July 2023. The Onassis Group’s Olympic Shipping and Management ranked second with at least $404 million, while Athens-based Stealth Maritime and Polembros Shipping each earned more than $200 million from the trade.

The activity falls within the G7 price cap mechanism, introduced in December 2022 to limit Moscow’s energy revenues while maintaining global oil flows. Western operators are permitted to transport Russian oil priced at or below the cap, currently set at $44.10 per barrel. However, policing of the regime has been described as “patchy at best” by former sanctions officials, with shipowners often relying on attestations from charterers or Russian suppliers rather than direct price verification.

The prominent role of Greek tankers in Russian oil exports has strained relations between Athens and Kyiv. In 2023, several Greek companies — including Dynacom — were designated as “international sponsors of war” by the Ukrainian sanctions body, only to be removed later following diplomatic pressure from the Greek government. Svitlana Romanko, director of the Ukrainian campaign group Razom We Stand, accused the Greek government of “repeatedly choosing the interests of its shipping industry above stronger sanctions and peace.”

Greek shipowners are widely regarded as the most risk-tolerant operators in the global tanker market. Traders reportedly pay 30 to 40 percent more to charter vessels for Russian crude compared to non-sanctioned routes, and Greek companies shipped approximately 15 percent of Russia’s crude exports in May alone, according to data from Windward and Vortexa.

The future of this lucrative trade remains uncertain. With the US and EU seeking to tighten restrictions on Moscow’s energy revenues ahead of a potential Ukraine peace deal, and with oil prices declining over the past three years, pressure is mounting to close loopholes in the sanctions regime. Some Greek firms have already distanced themselves from the trade: TMS Tankers and Thenamaris largely exited in late 2023 following US sanctions on Turkish and UAE maritime operators, while others retreated after Washington imposed measures on Rosneft and Lukoil in October 2025.

Dynacom defended its operations, stating its calls to Russian ports were “in full compliance with all applicable and prevailing legal and sanctions frameworks,” and argued that Greek shipping had helped mitigate global inflationary pressures. Olympic Shipping and Stealth Maritime similarly asserted compliance with EU, UK, and US sanctions, though the latter noted that one of its tankers carrying Russian ammonia was targeted in a suspected Ukrainian attack last year.

Photo: Wikimedia  

More News

Iran’s Leaderless War Machine: The IRGC’s Autonomous Cells and the Escalation Nobody Controls

In the fog of a war that has already claimed Iran’s supreme leader and its top military brass, a new and perhaps more dangerous threat is emerging from the rubble of Tehran’s shattered command structure: a Revolutionary Guard Corps that, by design, no longer needs orders from above. Sources with direct knowledge of the situation confirm that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) continues to prosecute strikes across the region not under the direction of the new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, but according to pre-programmed autonomous protocols embedded deep within its decentralized “mosaic defense” architecture. The result is a war machine that has become, in the most literal sense, self-propelling — and increasingly difficult for anyone to stop. A New Supreme Leader With Limited Command Mojtaba Khamenei was formally elected Supreme Leader on 8 March 2026, succeeding his father Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in the opening wave of the US-Israeli “Operation Epic Fury...

2026 US/Israel–Iran War Risk: Why the Chance of Escalation Is Meaningfully Elevated

As 2025 closes, the US/Israel–Iran confrontation is no longer a low-grade shadow struggle managed mainly through diplomacy and proxy conflicts ; it is an openly articulated deterrence contest in which leaders have publicly tied credibility to “red lines” and rapid retaliation. President Trump has stated that if Iran rebuilds its nuclear capabilities or continues rebuilding missile capacity , the response could be immediate and more severe—language that reduces room for quiet de-escalation once a new incident occurs.  At the same time, Iran has replied with warnings of harsh consequences for any renewed attacks, reinforcing a mutual-threat environment where misperception and political signaling can substitute for verifiable facts.  Against that backdrop, the key analytical point for 2026 is not whether a “full war” is the default outcome; it is that the probability that a limited clash escalates into a broader, sustained conflict is meaningfully elevated because the stabili...

Iran's Headscarf Rules Quietly Loosen — But No Law Has Changed

Bareheaded women appear openly in Tehran cafés and streets, yet activists warn the shift is fragile and the law remains on the books. Images have been circulating on social media of something that would have been almost unimaginable in Iran just a few years ago: women sipping coffee in Tehran cafés, strolling busy city streets, and sitting in restaurants — all without a headscarf. The scenes have ignited global attention and renewed debate over whether the Islamic Republic is quietly retreating from one of its most defining ideological pillars. For decades, wearing the hijab in public has been mandatory for all women in Iran — a rule enshrined in the Islamic Penal Code since 1983 and treated as a cornerstone of the clerical state established after the 1979 revolution. Violations could result in fines, arrest, or worse. Yet in recent weeks and months, enforcement appears to have noticeably slackened, at least in major urban centres. A Visible Shift on the Streets Reporters and residents...