Skip to main content

Behind Leavitt's Exit: Official Story Faces Unverified Iranian Claims of Internal Power Struggle

 


When Karoline Leavitt announced on August 12 that she would step down as White House press secretary at the end of the month, the official explanation was simple: motherhood. Leavitt, 28, said she could not "be the best mom my two young children deserve" while holding one of the most demanding jobs in Washington, and President Donald Trump praised her as one of the best press secretaries in the history of the office.

But an alternative account is circulating — and it deserves to be treated with considerable caution, given its origin. Nournews, an outlet linked to Iran's Supreme National Security Council, published a report this week claiming Leavitt's resignation was not about family at all, but the culmination of a bureaucratic power struggle inside Trump's inner circle. Citing an unnamed senior NBC journalist and unspecified "informed sources," Nournews alleges that Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had long sought to push Leavitt out, and that matters came to a head after classified information about U.S. munitions shortages and war-damage assessments from the conflict with Iran was leaked to the press. According to Nournews, a five-day internal probe ordered by Hegseth named three suspects — Small Business Administration head Kelly Loeffler, a senior Hegseth aide, and Leavitt herself — with Rubio and Hegseth reportedly telling Trump directly that they considered Leavitt the leaker. The outlet further claims Trump grew visibly colder toward Leavitt afterward, including an alleged humiliating remark to her in early July, and that Leavitt pre-empted a humiliating firing by resigning on her own terms — after first leaking, as a parting shot, the story of Trump's use of a decoy cargo plane while departing Turkey.

None of these specific claims — the five-day probe, the three named suspects, the Trump-Rubio-Hegseth meeting, or Leavitt's alleged role in leaking the plane story — could be independently verified through Western reporting, and Nournews' sourcing is anonymous and unconfirmed. Readers should treat the account as an unverified, Iranian-linked narrative rather than established fact.

What is independently documented is narrower but real. A genuine controversy did erupt this month over U.S. munitions supplies during the Iran conflict: the Washington Post reported that Trump confronted Hegseth at Camp David over depleted stockpiles of precision missiles, which Hegseth reportedly blamed on his deputy, Stephen Feinberg. Leavitt publicly and forcefully denied the Post's account as "100% fake news," and Trump himself vowed to hunt down the "leakers," though Reuters separately confirmed the Army had used nearly all of its long-range precision munitions. Earlier, Hegseth had also launched an FBI probe into a leaked Defense Intelligence Agency assessment questioning the effectiveness of U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.

Separately, the "decoy plane" story is real but distinct from Nournews' framing. Multiple U.S. outlets, including the New York Times and Washington Post, reported that Trump was secretly moved between aircraft while departing Ankara on July 8 amid an alleged Iran-linked threat — a threat U.S. intelligence reportedly could not fully verify. However, Forbes and the fact-checking site Snopes reported that Leavitt was not aboard either flight, contradicting claims — amplified by Iran's embassy in South Africa — that she was "betrayed" by being left behind.

For now, the true reasons behind Leavitt's departure remain unconfirmed beyond her own public statement.

More News

Iran’s Leaderless War Machine: The IRGC’s Autonomous Cells and the Escalation Nobody Controls

In the fog of a war that has already claimed Iran’s supreme leader and its top military brass, a new and perhaps more dangerous threat is emerging from the rubble of Tehran’s shattered command structure: a Revolutionary Guard Corps that, by design, no longer needs orders from above. Sources with direct knowledge of the situation confirm that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) continues to prosecute strikes across the region not under the direction of the new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, but according to pre-programmed autonomous protocols embedded deep within its decentralized “mosaic defense” architecture. The result is a war machine that has become, in the most literal sense, self-propelling — and increasingly difficult for anyone to stop. A New Supreme Leader With Limited Command Mojtaba Khamenei was formally elected Supreme Leader on 8 March 2026, succeeding his father Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in the opening wave of the US-Israeli “Operation Epic Fury...

2026 US/Israel–Iran War Risk: Why the Chance of Escalation Is Meaningfully Elevated

As 2025 closes, the US/Israel–Iran confrontation is no longer a low-grade shadow struggle managed mainly through diplomacy and proxy conflicts ; it is an openly articulated deterrence contest in which leaders have publicly tied credibility to “red lines” and rapid retaliation. President Trump has stated that if Iran rebuilds its nuclear capabilities or continues rebuilding missile capacity , the response could be immediate and more severe—language that reduces room for quiet de-escalation once a new incident occurs.  At the same time, Iran has replied with warnings of harsh consequences for any renewed attacks, reinforcing a mutual-threat environment where misperception and political signaling can substitute for verifiable facts.  Against that backdrop, the key analytical point for 2026 is not whether a “full war” is the default outcome; it is that the probability that a limited clash escalates into a broader, sustained conflict is meaningfully elevated because the stabili...

Iran's Headscarf Rules Quietly Loosen — But No Law Has Changed

Bareheaded women appear openly in Tehran cafés and streets, yet activists warn the shift is fragile and the law remains on the books. Images have been circulating on social media of something that would have been almost unimaginable in Iran just a few years ago: women sipping coffee in Tehran cafés, strolling busy city streets, and sitting in restaurants — all without a headscarf. The scenes have ignited global attention and renewed debate over whether the Islamic Republic is quietly retreating from one of its most defining ideological pillars. For decades, wearing the hijab in public has been mandatory for all women in Iran — a rule enshrined in the Islamic Penal Code since 1983 and treated as a cornerstone of the clerical state established after the 1979 revolution. Violations could result in fines, arrest, or worse. Yet in recent weeks and months, enforcement appears to have noticeably slackened, at least in major urban centres. A Visible Shift on the Streets Reporters and residents...