Skip to main content

China Rejects Trump's Iran "Economic Warfare"



Beijing calls for diplomacy as Washington threatens to isolate Iran's economy and its trading partners, with China — Iran's top oil buyer — squarely in the crosshairs ahead of a planned Trump-Xi summit


China has firmly rejected US President Donald Trump's threat to unleash what he called the "most crushing economic operation ever taken against any country" on Iran, warning that sanctions and pressure will not resolve the six-month-old crisis.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian told reporters at a regular briefing in Beijing that "sanctions and pressure will not help resolve the issue," urging "relevant parties to take responsible measures and seek to solve the issue through diplomatic and political means." Lin repeated the message at a follow-up briefing, saying such measures do not "fit the interest of any party."

The pushback follows a Truth Social post Trump published Wednesday evening, in which he vowed "Economic Warfare and Isolation on an unprecedented scale" against Iran over Tehran's refusal to reach a deal ending the war. Trump singled out oil smuggling, financial swap lines, cash transfers, foreign exchange houses, ship registries and front companies as targets, though he did not name specific countries.

China did not need naming. Beijing buys more than 90 percent of Iran's oil exports and was Iran's second-largest trading partner in 2025, behind the United Arab Emirates — which this week severed all economic ties with Tehran. Washington has already sanctioned a number of smaller Chinese "teapot" refineries and trading firms since the US and Israel launched the war against Iran in late February, but has so far stopped short of targeting the major state banks that finance the bulk of the oil trade.

That restraint reflects the delicate balance both sides are navigating. Beijing does not recognize unilateral US sanctions and in May ordered domestic firms not to comply with penalties on five refiners. Yet its largest state banks have a long history of quietly complying with US sanctions on Iran and North Korea to preserve access to the dollar-clearing system — leaving Chinese lenders caught between political directives at home and financial exposure abroad.

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent amplified the pressure Thursday, telling CNBC that Beijing needed to "get with the program," while declining to detail private conversations with Chinese counterparts. Bessent also revived talk of regime change in Tehran, saying sustained economic pressure made a return to "large-scale kinetic" military action less likely — a notable shift after months of the administration insisting the war's sole aim was preventing an Iranian nuclear weapon.

The timing raises the stakes considerably. Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping are due to meet at the White House on September 24, and analysts say Washington has limited real leverage over Beijing. China's independent refiners largely operate outside the US financial system, and Chatham House's Yu Jie noted the threats are unlikely to "alter China's involvement and the existing trading relationship with Iran."

Iran, for its part, has branded the US campaign "economic terrorism" and "unlawful," vowing it will fail. Its foreign minister called the pressure a continuation of Washington's "failed policies" that will lead to "further defeat" for the United States.

More News

Iran’s Leaderless War Machine: The IRGC’s Autonomous Cells and the Escalation Nobody Controls

In the fog of a war that has already claimed Iran’s supreme leader and its top military brass, a new and perhaps more dangerous threat is emerging from the rubble of Tehran’s shattered command structure: a Revolutionary Guard Corps that, by design, no longer needs orders from above. Sources with direct knowledge of the situation confirm that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) continues to prosecute strikes across the region not under the direction of the new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, but according to pre-programmed autonomous protocols embedded deep within its decentralized “mosaic defense” architecture. The result is a war machine that has become, in the most literal sense, self-propelling — and increasingly difficult for anyone to stop. A New Supreme Leader With Limited Command Mojtaba Khamenei was formally elected Supreme Leader on 8 March 2026, succeeding his father Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in the opening wave of the US-Israeli “Operation Epic Fury...

2026 US/Israel–Iran War Risk: Why the Chance of Escalation Is Meaningfully Elevated

As 2025 closes, the US/Israel–Iran confrontation is no longer a low-grade shadow struggle managed mainly through diplomacy and proxy conflicts ; it is an openly articulated deterrence contest in which leaders have publicly tied credibility to “red lines” and rapid retaliation. President Trump has stated that if Iran rebuilds its nuclear capabilities or continues rebuilding missile capacity , the response could be immediate and more severe—language that reduces room for quiet de-escalation once a new incident occurs.  At the same time, Iran has replied with warnings of harsh consequences for any renewed attacks, reinforcing a mutual-threat environment where misperception and political signaling can substitute for verifiable facts.  Against that backdrop, the key analytical point for 2026 is not whether a “full war” is the default outcome; it is that the probability that a limited clash escalates into a broader, sustained conflict is meaningfully elevated because the stabili...

Iran's Headscarf Rules Quietly Loosen — But No Law Has Changed

Bareheaded women appear openly in Tehran cafés and streets, yet activists warn the shift is fragile and the law remains on the books. Images have been circulating on social media of something that would have been almost unimaginable in Iran just a few years ago: women sipping coffee in Tehran cafés, strolling busy city streets, and sitting in restaurants — all without a headscarf. The scenes have ignited global attention and renewed debate over whether the Islamic Republic is quietly retreating from one of its most defining ideological pillars. For decades, wearing the hijab in public has been mandatory for all women in Iran — a rule enshrined in the Islamic Penal Code since 1983 and treated as a cornerstone of the clerical state established after the 1979 revolution. Violations could result in fines, arrest, or worse. Yet in recent weeks and months, enforcement appears to have noticeably slackened, at least in major urban centres. A Visible Shift on the Streets Reporters and residents...