Skip to main content

Iran Unveils Underground Missile Plants as Kayhan Frames Show of Strength Against Looming US Sanctions



As Washington prepares what Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has called the "toughest sanctions in history" against Tehran, Iran's ultra-hardline daily Kayhan has responded not with diplomatic protest but with a display of military muscle — publishing an unusually detailed account of the country's underground missile production complex, timed to coincide with National Defense Industry Day.

The report deserves scrutiny not just for its content but for its source. Kayhan is not an independent Iranian newspaper. It is directly controlled by the office of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, whose representative, Hossein Shariatmadari, has served as its managing editor since 1993. Widely described in Tehran as the "attack dog" of Khamenei's court, Kayhan functions less as a conventional news outlet than as a signaling mechanism for the Islamic Republic's innermost power center — a vehicle through which the Supreme Leader's office tests messaging, projects defiance, and sets the boundaries of acceptable hardline discourse. When Kayhan publishes something this triumphalist, on this precise a timeline, it is reasonable to read it as a curated message rather than independent reporting.

The article itself centers on a rare visit by armed forces chief of staff Major General Ali Abdollahi to one of what Iranian officials describe as dozens of underground missile production sites — part of a nationwide network of so-called "missile cities" built into mountains and remote terrain, designed specifically to survive US and Israeli airstrikes. State television released footage, for the first time, of an industrial planetary mixer used for solid-fuel missile production alongside newly manufactured Almas anti-tank missiles.

The messaging was unambiguous. Defense ministry spokesman Reza Talaei-Nik claimed that annual defense production doubled between July 2025 and July 2026, and that output of "strategic military products" had more than tripled since the February 2026 war with the US and Israel began. Suicide drone production alone, officials said, had tripled. Iran now claims 90 percent self-sufficiency in weapons manufacturing, with a defense-industrial network of more than 9,000 private and knowledge-based firms — a deliberate rebuttal to Washington's earlier claim that 85 percent of Iran's defense-industrial base had been destroyed during the war.

The timing is the story. Bessent is set to unveil what he has described as unprecedented economic measures targeting Iran's remaining trade relationships with third countries, following President Trump's threat of an "economic D-Day" and warnings of "tremendous economic consequences" for any state continuing business with Tehran. Iran's Foreign Ministry has already denounced the coming measures as a "complete erosion of sovereignty," likening them to "classic colonialism." Against that backdrop, Kayhan's missile-city unveiling reads as Tehran's preferred rebuttal: not a plea for sanctions relief, but a demonstration that pressure — economic or military — has failed to dent the Islamic Republic's capacity to rearm.

That claim is not without independent support. A Jerusalem Post report on August 14, cited by regional analysts, said Israeli military and Mossad officials were "shocked" by the speed of Iran's post-war missile recovery, having twice before — after strikes in October 2024 and June 2025 — declared Iranian production set back by years, only to see it rebound within months. A separate US intelligence assessment reportedly found Iran retained roughly 75 percent of its mobile launchers and 70 percent of its pre-war missile stockpile, considerably higher than the Trump administration's public 85-percent-destruction claim.

Whether Iran's underground production figures are fully accurate is unverifiable by design — Talaei-Nik himself said disclosures are "limited... in order to surprise the enemy." But the choreography is clear: as Washington moves to tighten the economic noose, Khamenei's own mouthpiece is broadcasting a message of resilience and deterrence, aimed as much at Israeli and American decision-makers as at a domestic audience being asked to endure another round of "maximum pressure." 

More News

Iran’s Leaderless War Machine: The IRGC’s Autonomous Cells and the Escalation Nobody Controls

In the fog of a war that has already claimed Iran’s supreme leader and its top military brass, a new and perhaps more dangerous threat is emerging from the rubble of Tehran’s shattered command structure: a Revolutionary Guard Corps that, by design, no longer needs orders from above. Sources with direct knowledge of the situation confirm that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) continues to prosecute strikes across the region not under the direction of the new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, but according to pre-programmed autonomous protocols embedded deep within its decentralized “mosaic defense” architecture. The result is a war machine that has become, in the most literal sense, self-propelling — and increasingly difficult for anyone to stop. A New Supreme Leader With Limited Command Mojtaba Khamenei was formally elected Supreme Leader on 8 March 2026, succeeding his father Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in the opening wave of the US-Israeli “Operation Epic Fury...

2026 US/Israel–Iran War Risk: Why the Chance of Escalation Is Meaningfully Elevated

As 2025 closes, the US/Israel–Iran confrontation is no longer a low-grade shadow struggle managed mainly through diplomacy and proxy conflicts ; it is an openly articulated deterrence contest in which leaders have publicly tied credibility to “red lines” and rapid retaliation. President Trump has stated that if Iran rebuilds its nuclear capabilities or continues rebuilding missile capacity , the response could be immediate and more severe—language that reduces room for quiet de-escalation once a new incident occurs.  At the same time, Iran has replied with warnings of harsh consequences for any renewed attacks, reinforcing a mutual-threat environment where misperception and political signaling can substitute for verifiable facts.  Against that backdrop, the key analytical point for 2026 is not whether a “full war” is the default outcome; it is that the probability that a limited clash escalates into a broader, sustained conflict is meaningfully elevated because the stabili...

Iran's Headscarf Rules Quietly Loosen — But No Law Has Changed

Bareheaded women appear openly in Tehran cafés and streets, yet activists warn the shift is fragile and the law remains on the books. Images have been circulating on social media of something that would have been almost unimaginable in Iran just a few years ago: women sipping coffee in Tehran cafés, strolling busy city streets, and sitting in restaurants — all without a headscarf. The scenes have ignited global attention and renewed debate over whether the Islamic Republic is quietly retreating from one of its most defining ideological pillars. For decades, wearing the hijab in public has been mandatory for all women in Iran — a rule enshrined in the Islamic Penal Code since 1983 and treated as a cornerstone of the clerical state established after the 1979 revolution. Violations could result in fines, arrest, or worse. Yet in recent weeks and months, enforcement appears to have noticeably slackened, at least in major urban centres. A Visible Shift on the Streets Reporters and residents...