Skip to main content

Nearly One in Five Israelis Have Considered Emigrating, Kan Poll Finds



Nearly one in five Israelis have considered leaving the country over the past two years, according to a poll conducted by Israel’s Kan public broadcaster, as emigration emerges as a potentially significant issue ahead of the upcoming election.

The findings, reported by the Middle East Monitor on Monday, showed that 18 per cent of respondents had considered emigrating, while 82 per cent said they had not.

The survey also indicated that emigration has become increasingly familiar within Israeli society. One-third of respondents said they knew someone who had left Israel during the past two years, compared with two-thirds who said they did not know anyone who had departed.

The issue is expected to feature prominently in the election campaign, amid concerns over the country’s political direction, security situation and social pressures. Israel is scheduled to hold its next election in October.

According to the poll, 12 per cent of respondents said the outcome of the election could influence their decision to remain in Israel or leave. Around two-thirds said the election result would not affect their decision, while one-fifth said they were unsure.

The findings point to a growing debate over emigration and the country’s ability to retain its citizens, particularly during a period of prolonged conflict and political uncertainty. Although most respondents said they had not considered leaving, the proportion who had done so—nearly one in five—underscores the scale of concern surrounding the issue.

The Middle East Monitor said worries over a rising number of Israelis choosing to live abroad are expected to make emigration a key topic in the forthcoming election.


More News

Iran’s Leaderless War Machine: The IRGC’s Autonomous Cells and the Escalation Nobody Controls

In the fog of a war that has already claimed Iran’s supreme leader and its top military brass, a new and perhaps more dangerous threat is emerging from the rubble of Tehran’s shattered command structure: a Revolutionary Guard Corps that, by design, no longer needs orders from above. Sources with direct knowledge of the situation confirm that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) continues to prosecute strikes across the region not under the direction of the new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, but according to pre-programmed autonomous protocols embedded deep within its decentralized “mosaic defense” architecture. The result is a war machine that has become, in the most literal sense, self-propelling — and increasingly difficult for anyone to stop. A New Supreme Leader With Limited Command Mojtaba Khamenei was formally elected Supreme Leader on 8 March 2026, succeeding his father Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in the opening wave of the US-Israeli “Operation Epic Fury...

2026 US/Israel–Iran War Risk: Why the Chance of Escalation Is Meaningfully Elevated

As 2025 closes, the US/Israel–Iran confrontation is no longer a low-grade shadow struggle managed mainly through diplomacy and proxy conflicts ; it is an openly articulated deterrence contest in which leaders have publicly tied credibility to “red lines” and rapid retaliation. President Trump has stated that if Iran rebuilds its nuclear capabilities or continues rebuilding missile capacity , the response could be immediate and more severe—language that reduces room for quiet de-escalation once a new incident occurs.  At the same time, Iran has replied with warnings of harsh consequences for any renewed attacks, reinforcing a mutual-threat environment where misperception and political signaling can substitute for verifiable facts.  Against that backdrop, the key analytical point for 2026 is not whether a “full war” is the default outcome; it is that the probability that a limited clash escalates into a broader, sustained conflict is meaningfully elevated because the stabili...

Iran's Headscarf Rules Quietly Loosen — But No Law Has Changed

Bareheaded women appear openly in Tehran cafés and streets, yet activists warn the shift is fragile and the law remains on the books. Images have been circulating on social media of something that would have been almost unimaginable in Iran just a few years ago: women sipping coffee in Tehran cafés, strolling busy city streets, and sitting in restaurants — all without a headscarf. The scenes have ignited global attention and renewed debate over whether the Islamic Republic is quietly retreating from one of its most defining ideological pillars. For decades, wearing the hijab in public has been mandatory for all women in Iran — a rule enshrined in the Islamic Penal Code since 1983 and treated as a cornerstone of the clerical state established after the 1979 revolution. Violations could result in fines, arrest, or worse. Yet in recent weeks and months, enforcement appears to have noticeably slackened, at least in major urban centres. A Visible Shift on the Streets Reporters and residents...