Skip to main content

Torpedo in the "Calm Waters": Turkey's Two Marine Parks Spark Firestorm from Greek Opposition



Ankara's latest move in the Aegean has shaken Greece's domestic political scene, after Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan — through two Presidential Decrees signed on August 15 and published the following day in Turkey's Official Gazette — declared two "national marine parks" in particularly sensitive areas, the Athens daily Efimerida ton Syntakton reported on Monday.

According to Efimerida ton Syntakton (efsyn.gr), the decision triggered fierce reactions from opposition parties, which accuse the government of complacency and demand a more active diplomatic response to what they describe as Turkish provocation.

As the paper notes, the decrees provide for the creation of parks at two locations. The first extends across the area between Fethiye (Muğla province) and Kaş (Antalya province) — a siting that effectively encloses and cuts off the entire sea area around Kastellorizo. The second park covers a maritime zone near the Turkish coasts of Tekirdağ and Çanakkale, stretching geographically between Samothrace and Lemnos.

Athens' Response: "Illegal Establishment"

In a statement cited by Efimerida ton Syntakton, the Greek Foreign Ministry characterized the establishment of these parks as illegal insofar as they cover international waters, stressing that under the Law of the Sea no state has the right to unilaterally create marine protected areas outside its national jurisdiction. Athens also underlined that the Turkish parks are illegal to the extent they extend over the Greek continental shelf, and that the Turkish action therefore "produces absolutely no legal effect" — neither with regard to international waters nor to Greek sovereign rights on the continental shelf.

The ministry placed particular emphasis on the point that Turkey's unilateral designation of "national" marine parks in areas outside its jurisdiction cannot create faits accomplis or affect rights deriving from International Law. It contrasted the Turkish move with Greece's own initiative to establish National Marine Parks in the Ionian and the Aegean, noting that Greece proceeded in full compliance with the Law of the Sea and exclusively within Greek territorial waters.

Athens further warned that actions seeking to create faits accomplis or unilaterally affect the status of maritime zones in the Aegean and the Eastern Mediterranean violate International Law and burden Greek-Turkish relations. Such moves, the ministry said, "do not contribute to consolidating a climate of good neighborliness and seriously undermine efforts to maintain relations of mutual understanding between the two countries." Greece, it concluded, will continue to act "with consistency and determination" to protect its sovereign rights, safeguard the freedoms of the high seas as provided by the Law of the Sea, and protect the marine environment in accordance with International Law.

PASOK: "An Adverse Scenario of Escalation"

PASOK was among the first parties to react. As Efimerida ton Syntakton reports, the party's competent sector heads, Dimitris Mantzos and Manolis Christodoulakis, called the Turkish move illegal and linked it to a broader effort by Ankara to establish new realities in the Aegean and the Eastern Mediterranean. The two MPs argue the proclamation contravenes the International Law of the Sea by disregarding Greek sovereign rights and the maritime entitlements of the Greek islands, and also runs counter to the European framework for the protection of biodiversity and the marine environment.

A particular point of criticism concerns Greece's delay in maritime spatial planning. Mantzos and Christodoulakis argue that a process which should have been completed earlier only began to be implemented by the government in 2025, while gaps remain in the special spatial frameworks — a delay that, in their view, weakens the Greek position against Turkish moves. PASOK also tied the development to the planned legislative enshrinement of the "Blue Homeland" doctrine, spoke of "an adverse scenario of escalation," and called on the government to pursue "careful analysis and decisive action," exercise all rights deriving from International and European law, and internationalize the issue at the EU and the international community. The party's reference to the "calm waters" was pointed: these, it said, should mean mutual sincerity and respect for international law — not serve as "a pretext and a cover for Turkish revisionism."

Greek Left Coalition: "The Government Must Change Course"

The reaction of the Greek Left Coalition (ELAS) was equally harsh. According to the Efimerida ton Syntakton report, the party's Foreign Policy section called the proclamation of the two marine parks "an unacceptable and provocative act" that violates the Law of the Sea, since the parks also extend over parts of the Greek continental shelf. ELAS demanded that the Greek government react immediately, denounce Turkish revisionism, and highlight the consequences of the Turkish move both bilaterally and in EU–Turkey relations — including the possibility of imposing European sanctions.

The party directed its criticism straight at government policy, calling the rise in Turkish tension "tangible proof of the failure of the Mitsotakis foreign policy," arguing the government allowed Ankara to invoke the "calm waters" whenever it suits it and return to provocations once its goals are secured. Its demand was explicit: an "immediate change of course" on Greek-Turkish issues, use of European and international alliances, pressure on Turkey, and a restart of exploratory contacts on the basis of international law.

SYRIZA: "Announcements and Wishful Thinking"

Rena Dourou, head of SYRIZA's parliamentary group, spoke of yet another link in the chain of Turkish aggressiveness and connected Erdoğan's decision to the "Blue Homeland" doctrine. As Efimerida ton Syntakton notes, SYRIZA pointed out that one of the two parks encloses the sea area around Kastellorizo, while the second lies between Samothrace and Lemnos — a development that, according to Dourou, demonstrates the escalation of Turkish policy and raises questions about Greek strategy. Her criticism of the Greek Foreign Ministry's response was particularly sharp: she dismissed the government's announcements as "wishful thinking" that does not suffice to protect Greece's sovereign rights. SYRIZA also raised the issue of the Greece–Cyprus and Kasos electricity interconnection, arguing the government has not shaped a coherent national strategy toward Turkey, and linked the latest development to the prospect of legislative enshrinement of the Turkish "Blue Homeland" doctrine.

Communist Party: "Calm Waters" and "Imperialist Settlements"

The Communist Party of Greece (KKE) described the proclamation of the two parks as a "new Turkish provocation," arguing it serves as a reminder of the dangers to the country's sovereign rights and to the peoples from settlements promoted within the framework of the roadmap for the cohesion of NATO's war machine in the Southeastern Mediterranean. As reported by Efimerida ton Syntakton, the KKE detailed the two Turkish decisions — one concerning the northeastern Aegean between Lemnos and Samothrace, the other stretching from Fethiye to Kaş and enclosing the Kastellorizo sea area — and recalled that Greece itself had proclaimed two National Marine Parks in 2025. The party framed today's confrontation as part of a broader antagonism over the control of wealth-producing resources and trade routes, and included the government's "calm waters" rhetoric in the same context, arguing that the new Turkish move exposes the dangers that persist behind the image of de-escalation projected by the government.

 

More News

Iran’s Leaderless War Machine: The IRGC’s Autonomous Cells and the Escalation Nobody Controls

In the fog of a war that has already claimed Iran’s supreme leader and its top military brass, a new and perhaps more dangerous threat is emerging from the rubble of Tehran’s shattered command structure: a Revolutionary Guard Corps that, by design, no longer needs orders from above. Sources with direct knowledge of the situation confirm that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) continues to prosecute strikes across the region not under the direction of the new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, but according to pre-programmed autonomous protocols embedded deep within its decentralized “mosaic defense” architecture. The result is a war machine that has become, in the most literal sense, self-propelling — and increasingly difficult for anyone to stop. A New Supreme Leader With Limited Command Mojtaba Khamenei was formally elected Supreme Leader on 8 March 2026, succeeding his father Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in the opening wave of the US-Israeli “Operation Epic Fury...

2026 US/Israel–Iran War Risk: Why the Chance of Escalation Is Meaningfully Elevated

As 2025 closes, the US/Israel–Iran confrontation is no longer a low-grade shadow struggle managed mainly through diplomacy and proxy conflicts ; it is an openly articulated deterrence contest in which leaders have publicly tied credibility to “red lines” and rapid retaliation. President Trump has stated that if Iran rebuilds its nuclear capabilities or continues rebuilding missile capacity , the response could be immediate and more severe—language that reduces room for quiet de-escalation once a new incident occurs.  At the same time, Iran has replied with warnings of harsh consequences for any renewed attacks, reinforcing a mutual-threat environment where misperception and political signaling can substitute for verifiable facts.  Against that backdrop, the key analytical point for 2026 is not whether a “full war” is the default outcome; it is that the probability that a limited clash escalates into a broader, sustained conflict is meaningfully elevated because the stabili...

Iran's Headscarf Rules Quietly Loosen — But No Law Has Changed

Bareheaded women appear openly in Tehran cafés and streets, yet activists warn the shift is fragile and the law remains on the books. Images have been circulating on social media of something that would have been almost unimaginable in Iran just a few years ago: women sipping coffee in Tehran cafés, strolling busy city streets, and sitting in restaurants — all without a headscarf. The scenes have ignited global attention and renewed debate over whether the Islamic Republic is quietly retreating from one of its most defining ideological pillars. For decades, wearing the hijab in public has been mandatory for all women in Iran — a rule enshrined in the Islamic Penal Code since 1983 and treated as a cornerstone of the clerical state established after the 1979 revolution. Violations could result in fines, arrest, or worse. Yet in recent weeks and months, enforcement appears to have noticeably slackened, at least in major urban centres. A Visible Shift on the Streets Reporters and residents...