Skip to main content

Netanyahu Received Explicit Warning Before Oct. 7 Attack, Failed to Brief Security Chiefs, Investigation Reveals



UAE President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed personally warned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that Hamas was planning a major operation against Israel less than two weeks before the October 7, 2023 massacre — but Netanyahu never shared the warning with Israel's top security officials, according to an extensive investigation published by Haaretz.

The revelations come from reporting by Shlomi Eldar and Ruth Yuval, conducted for their new book, "Hostages: 843 Days of Abandonment" (Kinneret Zmora Publishing). The research drew on dozens of sources in Israel and abroad, including recordings, internal documents, and correspondence.

According to the Haaretz report, bin Zayed called Netanyahu from the Presidential Palace in Abu Dhabi for a 45-minute conversation, warning that Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar was preparing a major operation that could destabilize the region and undermine the Abraham Accords. Netanyahu reportedly responded calmly, telling the Emirati ruler he believed Hamas intended to operate in the West Bank and that Israel was prepared for any scenario.

Three senior foreign sources confirmed the call's contents. Bin Zayed later recounted the conversation to CIA Director William J. Burns, telling him he had sensed "something there is about to explode."

Crucially, the heads of the Shin Bet, the Mossad, and the IDF chief of staff were never informed. "If we had known about the warnings... it could have changed our entire assessment picture," a senior Shin Bet official told Haaretz. Former Shin Bet chief Ronen Bar and former IDF Chief of Staff Herzl Halevi both confirmed they were not briefed.

The investigation traces the warning's origins to secret Israel-Hamas truce talks that Netanyahu had approved but repeatedly stalled. In September 2023, Sinwar cut off contact and told a Fatah intermediary to warn Israel of a coming "zilzal" — an earthquake. That message reached bin Zayed through a Palestinian adviser, prompting both the Shin Bet warning on September 15 and the later direct call to Netanyahu. A similar warning came from Egyptian intelligence chief Gen. Abbas Kamel.

The report also details missed opportunities after the attack, including Qatari mediation offers for the release of civilian hostages that Israeli officials initially rebuffed.

Netanyahu's office dismissed the investigation as "an absolute lie," stating the prime minister "didn't speak to the president of the UAE during the period in question and received no warning from him." Bin Zayed did not respond to Haaretz's request for comment.

Photo: AI

More News

Iran’s Leaderless War Machine: The IRGC’s Autonomous Cells and the Escalation Nobody Controls

In the fog of a war that has already claimed Iran’s supreme leader and its top military brass, a new and perhaps more dangerous threat is emerging from the rubble of Tehran’s shattered command structure: a Revolutionary Guard Corps that, by design, no longer needs orders from above. Sources with direct knowledge of the situation confirm that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) continues to prosecute strikes across the region not under the direction of the new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, but according to pre-programmed autonomous protocols embedded deep within its decentralized “mosaic defense” architecture. The result is a war machine that has become, in the most literal sense, self-propelling — and increasingly difficult for anyone to stop. A New Supreme Leader With Limited Command Mojtaba Khamenei was formally elected Supreme Leader on 8 March 2026, succeeding his father Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in the opening wave of the US-Israeli “Operation Epic Fury...

2026 US/Israel–Iran War Risk: Why the Chance of Escalation Is Meaningfully Elevated

As 2025 closes, the US/Israel–Iran confrontation is no longer a low-grade shadow struggle managed mainly through diplomacy and proxy conflicts ; it is an openly articulated deterrence contest in which leaders have publicly tied credibility to “red lines” and rapid retaliation. President Trump has stated that if Iran rebuilds its nuclear capabilities or continues rebuilding missile capacity , the response could be immediate and more severe—language that reduces room for quiet de-escalation once a new incident occurs.  At the same time, Iran has replied with warnings of harsh consequences for any renewed attacks, reinforcing a mutual-threat environment where misperception and political signaling can substitute for verifiable facts.  Against that backdrop, the key analytical point for 2026 is not whether a “full war” is the default outcome; it is that the probability that a limited clash escalates into a broader, sustained conflict is meaningfully elevated because the stabili...

Iran's Headscarf Rules Quietly Loosen — But No Law Has Changed

Bareheaded women appear openly in Tehran cafés and streets, yet activists warn the shift is fragile and the law remains on the books. Images have been circulating on social media of something that would have been almost unimaginable in Iran just a few years ago: women sipping coffee in Tehran cafés, strolling busy city streets, and sitting in restaurants — all without a headscarf. The scenes have ignited global attention and renewed debate over whether the Islamic Republic is quietly retreating from one of its most defining ideological pillars. For decades, wearing the hijab in public has been mandatory for all women in Iran — a rule enshrined in the Islamic Penal Code since 1983 and treated as a cornerstone of the clerical state established after the 1979 revolution. Violations could result in fines, arrest, or worse. Yet in recent weeks and months, enforcement appears to have noticeably slackened, at least in major urban centres. A Visible Shift on the Streets Reporters and residents...