Sipan Hizni had joined the Syrian army through the agreement meant to end the confrontation between Damascus and Kurdish-led forces. His killing near Hasaka in September, followed by a deadly prison fire in Kobane, has exposed how vulnerable that settlement remains. Military integration has advanced. The fear that brought people into the streets has survived it.
By The Levant Files Editorial Desk | Analysis
Photo: SANA and Rudaw
The Killing That Shook the Agreement
According to Rudaw's September 12 reporting, Hizni belonged to a Syrian army brigade formed from former Syrian Democratic Forces fighters. Armed men believed to belong to an Arab clan abducted and killed him near Hasaka. Security authorities said they had identified the main suspect, who remained at large at the time of that report.
He was already serving inside the state structure. That detail gives the killing its political weight: Kurdish leaders had asked their communities to accept integration as a route toward security, yet a soldier who had taken that route was still vulnerable to armed revenge.
His killing does not establish that Damascus ordered the crime. Responsibility belongs with the perpetrators, and allegations against particular clan members must never become an accusation against Arab communities collectively. But the government's response carries consequences for everyone being asked to trust its protection. A credible investigation and an arrest would give that promise substance.
Kobane's Grief Deepens the Distrust
Then came the prison fire. Rudaw reported at least nine deaths after unrest in Kobane, where demonstrators had protested Hizni's killing. Its account connected the escalation inside the prison to fears that detainees would be transferred to government-controlled facilities in Aleppo.
One injured prisoner, Mahmoud, told Rudaw that guards refused to let those inside escape. That is a survivor's allegation, requiring independent investigation. The circumstances of the fire and the conduct of those responsible for the detainees deserve public scrutiny, with findings that families can examine.
Kobane carries memories of the battle against Islamic State. A disaster inside its prison therefore falls on a community that has already endured siege and loss, while Kurdish leaders are asking people to accept a profound change in who commands their security.
For families waiting to learn how relatives died, another appeal for restraint can sound painfully incomplete. Damascus and Kurdish officials need to explain who controlled the facility, what happened during the attempted evacuation, and how surviving detainees will be protected.
The Classroom Is Another Front
The dispute reaches into schools. Children who have learned through Kurdish under the autonomous administration now face a transition whose long-term rules remain uncertain.
In Rudaw's September 23 account of Ahmed al-Sharaa's remarks, the Syrian president said an agreement had been reached to provide Kurdish-language education in Kurdish-inhabited areas. He described recognition of Kurdish cultural and linguistic rights as a government obligation. Education Ministry teams, he said, were preparing implementation measures.
That announcement deserves attention. It also leaves practical questions.
Rudaw described transitional rules providing three Kurdish-language classes weekly, with several other subjects available in Kurdish or Arabic during the first academic year. The longer-term extent of Kurdish-medium schooling remained unsettled. For parents, the difference between studying Kurdish as a subject and learning through Kurdish affects the whole school day.
Teachers need usable instructions before entering the classroom. Families need to know which textbooks their children will receive, how examinations will work, and what happens after the transitional year. Leaving those decisions unclear gives suspicion room to grow, even when the president's public commitment points toward accommodation.
Fuel Prices Bring the Settlement Home
Household budgets are becoming another source of resistance. In its September 16 reporting from northeast Syria, the Associated Press described demonstrators blocking the M4 highway near Tal Tamr after fuel-price increases. The removal of subsidies previously available under Kurdish-led administration had already strained residents.
AP also reported continuing negotiations over the future of the Women's Protection Units, the YPJ. Their place within the new security structure remained disputed.
These pressures reach different parts of daily life. A family facing higher transport costs may judge integration through its dwindling income. A woman who served against Islamic State may judge it through the duties she is permitted to retain. Both experiences will influence how much support Kurdish leaders can sustain for the agreement.
A Kurdish Flag Burns as Hasaka's Tensions Spill Into the Streets
Friday's demonstrations in Hasaka have brought another threat to the Damascus–Kurdish settlement into public view. According to Rudaw's October 2 report, citing the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, dozens of protesters from the Arab-majority Ghweran neighborhood marched toward the city center, demanding full central government control over the province. Security forces had deployed ahead of the march.
At Peace Square, some protesters burned a Kurdish flag. The monitor said state-affiliated General Security personnel were present. Kurdish demonstrators subsequently took to the streets to defend Kurdish symbols and support the Kurdish-led administration. Similar demonstrations backing the Ghweran protesters' demands took place in Raqqa and Ras al-Ain.
For Kurdish residents already shaken by September's violence, the flag-burning adds a disturbing question about their place in the new Syria. The reported presence of security personnel warrants an explanation of how officers responded. It does not, by itself, establish official approval of the act.
The demand for greater state authority also presses on an unresolved part of the January agreement. Rudaw describes Hasaka as retaining a mixture of central government and Kurdish-led administrative and security arrangements while integration proceeds. Those arrangements now face pressure from demonstrators who want Damascus to take complete control.
Dozens of marchers cannot speak for Hasaka's Arab population, just as the actions of those who burned the flag should be attributed to the people responsible. Yet the incident creates room for ethnic provocation to overtake negotiations. Damascus needs to explain how it will protect Kurdish residents and their symbols while extending its authority, and both sides need to clarify the local security arrangements before rival crowds attempt to settle the question in Hasaka's streets.
Diplomatic Progress Meets a Harder Local Test
Ankara has welcomed the military transition. As Rudaw reported from the September 13 Damascus talks, Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan praised the SDF's dissolution and integration into Syrian institutions. Former fighters had entered Syrian army brigades while remaining deployed in the Kurdish region.
Turkey has long sought an end to the SDF's independent military structure, viewing its main Kurdish component, the YPG, as linked to the PKK. Kurdish residents bring a different set of concerns to the same transition, including protection from armed groups and the survival of institutions built during years of self-rule.
The agreement is still producing results. In its September 16 report on detainee releases, Rudaw said Damascus had freed another 49 former SDF members, including two women, under the January 29 settlement. Each release matters to a family. It also shows that cooperation can continue through a period of anger.
The danger is that such progress becomes too remote from what people experience in Hasaka and Kobane. Leaders can agree on appointments and military structures while residents continue to fear detention, retaliation or the erosion of their language rights.
Damascus has the greater responsibility because it is assuming the greater authority. Kurdish leaders must also answer questions about detention practices and explain the compromises they have accepted. The next steps need to be visible where September's damage was felt: a transparent investigation into Hizni's killing, independent scrutiny of the prison deaths, and clear education rules that teachers and parents can use.
Comments
Post a Comment