The agency argues that the end of the conflict was not a bilateral ceasefire but a unilateral declaration of failure by the U.S. and Israel. It asserts that the "final blow" was delivered by Iranian missile attacks on the American base in Al-Udeid, Qatar, and on Israeli territory. These strikes, the article claims, inflicted unforeseen and unsustainable damage, compelling the opposing side to halt their aggression after failing to achieve their stated goal of forcing Iran into a "complete surrender agreement."
This outcome is framed as a comprehensive failure to achieve any of the stated U.S. and Israeli strategic goals. The article states that objectives such as changing Iran's political order, ending its nuclear and missile capabilities, and imposing a surrender agreement were not met. Instead, it claims the conflict fostered "unprecedented political and social cohesion" within Iran and demonstrated that its missile power could dictate the terms of engagement.
The news agency accuses former U.S. President Trump and Israeli officials of now engaging in a psychological operation through the media to reframe their "defeat in the field" as a decision made from a position of power. The article concludes with a warning against what it terms internal "Trump platforms," which it says promote the enemy's narrative by misinterpreting the "imposition of defeat" on the enemy as an "imposed peace" on Iran and attempting to turn a foreign conflict into a domestic political dispute.
Photo: Wikimedia Commons