Skip to main content

THE LEVANT FILES — SPECIAL REPORT: "They Will Not Encircle Us". Latest Developments Push Greek–Turkish Relations to the Brink



Ankara frames the Aegean standoff as a foreign-orchestrated containment effort, names Israel as the driving force, and issues Athens its starkest ultimatum since the 2020 EastMed crisis


Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's recent declaration that Turkey will prevent other powers from "encircling" his country was not, according to sources close to the Turkish government who spoke to The Levant Files, a piece of campaign-season rhetoric. It was, they insist, a strategic warning — and its first and primary addressee was Athens.

Turkish–Greek relations, these sources warn, are now officially at a "boiling point."

Echoes of 2020

Some sources go further, drawing a direct and sobering parallel between today's climate and the summer of 2020, when Ankara and Athens came within one step of an open military clash in the Eastern Mediterranean. The comparison is deliberate. In Turkish strategic discourse, 2020 remains the benchmark for how quickly maritime friction can escalate into confrontation — and the message embedded in the parallel is that the fuse, once again, is short.

The "Containment" Narrative: France, Israel, and the Encirclement Thesis

From Ankara's vantage point, the bitter new reality in Greek–Turkish relations is not bilateral at all. Turkish sources describe Athens as drifting behind France, Israel, and other powers that refuse to accept the emergence of Turkey as a strong regional actor.

Israel occupies a special place in this reading. Ankara believes Israel is determined to limit Turkey's ascendance both in Syria and across the wider region — and that it is leveraging its deepening relationship with Greece to do precisely that. The new Israeli-made aerial defence system deployed in Greece is cited as exhibit A: not an incidental procurement, Turkish sources argue, but a calculated move to pressure Turkey on its western shores while Ankara's attention is fixed on Syria and the East.

The picture Ankara paints is one of coordinated encirclement — the very scenario Erdoğan has vowed to prevent.

Domestic Politics in Athens: Elections, the Far Right, and the "Sabotage" of Dialogue

In a broader and more pointed accusation, the Turkish sources charge that Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis' government is deliberately raising tensions with Turkey to curb the ascent of the far right in Greece, just months ahead of parliamentary elections. Manufacturing external friction, in this view, serves as domestic electoral insulation.

Ankara also claims that within Mitsotakis' own party there are elements actively working to sabotage the Turkish–Greek dialogue. The frustration in Ankara is unmistakable — and it is personal. Turkish sources do not hide their irritation with the recent remarks and policy steps of Greek Defence Minister Nikos Dendias, whom they appear to regard as a central figure in the hardening of Athens' posture.

Ankara's Ultimatum on the "Sea of the Islands"

The core message to Athens, however, is delivered with unusual bluntness. Ankara is calling on Greece to immediately reconfigure its policies toward Turkey. Specifically:

- The militarization of the "Sea of the Islands" — the new Turkish designation for the Aegean — serves neither Greek nor Turkish interests.

- Should Athens continue to ignore Turkey's warnings, transfer military assets to the islands, or install foreign military systems on them, an open conflict will be unavoidable.

The renaming of the Aegean is itself a statement — a rhetorical assertion that the sea in question is not, in Ankara's framing, a Greek lake.

The Eastern Mediterranean Red Line: "Nothing Proceeds Without Ankara"

On the planned Israel–Cyprus–Greece electricity interconnection, Turkish sources reiterate Ankara's official and uncompromising line: no project in the Eastern Mediterranean can proceed without the green light of Turkey. The energy map of the region, Ankara insists, cannot be drawn over Turkish objections.

Dialogue, Yes — But Do Not Mistake It for Softness

Responding to The Levant Files' observation that the current spike in tensions may indeed be linked to forthcoming elections in both countries — and that communication channels between the two capitals remain operational — the Turkish sources stress that Ankara always welcomes dialogue.

But they attach a pointed caveat: the desire for dialogue must not be confused with the severity of the situation, or with the depth of frustration in Ankara over what it describes as new, one-sided steps from Athens. An open channel, in other words, is not a safety net.

Cyprus: "Accept the Realities"

Finally, on the inevitable spillover of Greek–Turkish deterioration into Cyprus, Turkish sources reiterate Ankara's settled position: there is no alternative on the island other than the acceptance of realities on the ground and the principle of equal sovereignty.

Just as in the "Sea of the Islands," they argue, in Cyprus two separate, sovereign nations can build bridges and cooperate in areas that benefit both peoples and serve the security of the wider region. It is a vision that forecloses the framework of a single, unified state — and one Nicosia and Athens have consistently rejected.

The Levant Files' Assessment

Taken together, the messages from Ankara amount to the most severe public framing of the Greek–Turkish relationship since 2020. The language of "boiling point," the explicit warning of "unavoidable" conflict, the red line over EastMed energy projects, and the rhetorical rebranding of the Aegean itself all point to a deliberate escalation of pressure — one timed, notably, to coincide with electoral calendars in both countries.

Whether Erdoğan's "encirclement" warning marks the opening of a genuine crisis or a calibrated coercive campaign will become clear in the coming weeks. What is already clear is that Ankara wants Athens — and its partners in Paris and Tel Aviv — to understand that, in Turkey's telling, the status quo in the Aegean is no longer tolerable.

The Levant Files will continue to monitor developments on both shores of the Aegean.

*Note: This report is based on the positions and claims of Turkish government-aligned sources. The characterizations of Greek, Israeli, and French intentions reflect Ankara's viewpoint and have not been independently verified.*

More News

Iran’s Leaderless War Machine: The IRGC’s Autonomous Cells and the Escalation Nobody Controls

In the fog of a war that has already claimed Iran’s supreme leader and its top military brass, a new and perhaps more dangerous threat is emerging from the rubble of Tehran’s shattered command structure: a Revolutionary Guard Corps that, by design, no longer needs orders from above. Sources with direct knowledge of the situation confirm that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) continues to prosecute strikes across the region not under the direction of the new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, but according to pre-programmed autonomous protocols embedded deep within its decentralized “mosaic defense” architecture. The result is a war machine that has become, in the most literal sense, self-propelling — and increasingly difficult for anyone to stop. A New Supreme Leader With Limited Command Mojtaba Khamenei was formally elected Supreme Leader on 8 March 2026, succeeding his father Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in the opening wave of the US-Israeli “Operation Epic Fury...

2026 US/Israel–Iran War Risk: Why the Chance of Escalation Is Meaningfully Elevated

As 2025 closes, the US/Israel–Iran confrontation is no longer a low-grade shadow struggle managed mainly through diplomacy and proxy conflicts ; it is an openly articulated deterrence contest in which leaders have publicly tied credibility to “red lines” and rapid retaliation. President Trump has stated that if Iran rebuilds its nuclear capabilities or continues rebuilding missile capacity , the response could be immediate and more severe—language that reduces room for quiet de-escalation once a new incident occurs.  At the same time, Iran has replied with warnings of harsh consequences for any renewed attacks, reinforcing a mutual-threat environment where misperception and political signaling can substitute for verifiable facts.  Against that backdrop, the key analytical point for 2026 is not whether a “full war” is the default outcome; it is that the probability that a limited clash escalates into a broader, sustained conflict is meaningfully elevated because the stabili...

Iran's Headscarf Rules Quietly Loosen — But No Law Has Changed

Bareheaded women appear openly in Tehran cafés and streets, yet activists warn the shift is fragile and the law remains on the books. Images have been circulating on social media of something that would have been almost unimaginable in Iran just a few years ago: women sipping coffee in Tehran cafés, strolling busy city streets, and sitting in restaurants — all without a headscarf. The scenes have ignited global attention and renewed debate over whether the Islamic Republic is quietly retreating from one of its most defining ideological pillars. For decades, wearing the hijab in public has been mandatory for all women in Iran — a rule enshrined in the Islamic Penal Code since 1983 and treated as a cornerstone of the clerical state established after the 1979 revolution. Violations could result in fines, arrest, or worse. Yet in recent weeks and months, enforcement appears to have noticeably slackened, at least in major urban centres. A Visible Shift on the Streets Reporters and residents...